Lateral Lines: Reef Aquarium Filtration Part I: Mechanical and Biological Filtration
Reef aquarium filtration has come a long ways in the past
two decades. The advancements are great
enough to warrant discussions and explanations on what we now use for
filtration. From humble beginnings to
complex (and often pricey) filtration systems there is now more than ever
before a need to review the products and concepts behind filtration methods.
Reef aquarium filtration is often divided into two
categories for ease of conversation.
The differentiation is usually in regards to whether the filtration (be
it device or concept) has a greater focus on biological breakdown of waste or a
greater focus on the removal of waste.
These two facets being commonly known as “biological filtration” and as
“mechanical filtration” respectively.
This classification is admittedly easy to use and generic when
conversing with other hobbyists.
However, I would like to propose another classification system which
categorizes filtration methods as “recycling” and “removing” methods. I will come back to this concept in a later
Current filtration methods for reef aquaria include the
following items: undergravel filter, hang on filters, canister filters, protein
skimmers, algal turf scrubbers, live rock, live sand, terrestrial rock, terrestrial
sand, UV sterilizers, filter floss, filter pads, filter socks, algal growth,
corals (including non reef building), anemones, water changes, sponges (living
and non-living), gravel/water siphoning, fish, crabs, shrimp, sea stars,
urchins, mangroves, and more. Wow isn’t
that a lot of stuff? In order to review
all of these items I’m going to divide them into the two common categories.
|Mechanical Filtration||Biological Filtration|
|Hang On Filters||Live Rock|
|Protein Skimmers||Live Sand|
|Water Changes||Macro Algae|
|Canister Filters||Clean Up Crews|
|Filter Socks||Micro Crustaceans|
I’ll start with this because it is usually simple to understand and familiar to
most hobbyists. Mechanical filtration
is typically carried out by a device you purchase. This can be a very cheap filter sock to a very expensive protein
The whole concept is to
remove waste particles from the aquarium before they have a chance to break
down into smaller organics. If that
doesn’t make sense, please go back and read that sentence again. The idea is to remove and thus prevent a
build up of organics in the system.
10 years now as biological filtration has dominated the hobby, the
usage and understanding of mechanical filtration has plummeted.
This may not be a bad thing, but it may generate a false sense of
security as aquariums continue to build their organic loads and reach a
The pro’s to these items center around effectiveness. Nearly all of the mechanical filtration devices for purchase do
in fact work. A filter sock really does
catch and remove things that flow through it, and an intake sponge does as
well. The con’s to such devices focus
on three aspects (that I can think of).
First of all in order to work these devices require effort on the part
of the hobbyist. The filter gests
clogged, the pump intake is overgrown with algae, the filter sock gets dirty,
and needless to say “somebody has to take out the trash” in a manner of
speaking. In other words if you don’t
think your filter is really working, try cleaning it out and I’ll bet it works
a lot better. The second con or
complaint about such devices is the cost.
No argument here. You do have to
buy them, or you do have to buy replacement parts. The third commonly cited down side to mechanical filtration is
“why buy something you don’t need?”.
That indeed is a great question, if it holds true. I’ll discuss this in the next section.
This is the newly found and booming area of reef aquaria
filtration. For over a decade now this
has been the rage. The addition of live
rock to salt water fish tanks may have been the greatest trend to ever hit the
hobby. The basic principle with
biological filtration is to take waste particles and break them down by safely
by biological means. I guess you could
say the idea is to break them down where they won’t cause problems, but I prefer
to think of it in another way. My
vision of this is to add more animals to the ecosystem which use these “waste
products” as a food source. Much like
one man’s garbage is another man’s treasure type of philosophy. Explaining this to a new hobbyist is often
difficult. Try telling someone that
their tank is polluted and really needs more bugs and bacteria to make it
of how you explain or define it, the idea is to use living organisms
to break down and consume waste products so that they don’t just break
into free floating or dissolvable organics. In my mind live rock and
are the undoubted champions of biological filtration. The surface
area, water channels, bacterial load, and protected
shelters offer a vast amount of biological activity. Additionally
corals an excellent filtration tool in reef
aquaria. Direct feeding and diffused
intake of organics allows corals to grow.
This feeding method directly removes matter from the water column and
converts it into something else. A
great aspect of this is that the “something else” it converts waste
happens to be a desirable product, namely coral growth.
Another area of nutrient removal is macro
algae. This concept has also been a
booming success for 10 years as refugia have flourished in the area of
aquaria. The idea here is to grow algae
(usually very beautiful and appealing in variety) as a way to remove
nutrients. As the algae grows it
removes nutrients, and the algae also serves as a food source for
fishes and as
a breeding ground for invertebrates.
Cons to biological filtration are rarely mentioned. The first downside is that biological
filtration never removes nutrients from the aquarium. Therefore as long as you are feeding your fish and your corals
you will be increasing the nutrient load of the aquarium. This can be related to the golden rule of
gardening “put in what you take out, take out what you put in”. If you are not harvesting your aquarium you
are accumulating matter in the system.
This may not be a problem if the fish and corals are growing, but they certainly are not growing at the rate of input by even the stingiest feeder. The second downside to biological filtration is really just an indirect trend. With the increased understanding and usages of biological filtration too often we forget about mechanical filtration. I’m not just referring to a short time affair but instead on global and long term setting. For 10 years now as biological filtration has dominated the hobby, the usage and understanding of mechanical filtration has plummeted. This may not be a bad thing, but it may generate a false sense of security as aquariums continue to build their organic loads and reach a maximum capacity. Upcoming presentations and publications (most notably by the wonderful Julian Sprung) will explore these ideas.
Both mechanical and biological filtration serve a role in
the reef aquaria hobby. Often times a
hobbyist will focus on one area/concept and will underestimate the need for the
other. While effective on their own, in
conjunction obviously appears to be a more effective overall method. It is important for a hobbyist to identify
which filtration methods they are using and how those methods are contributing
to the health of their system.
Adam Blundell M.S. works in Marine Ecology, and in Pathology for the University of Utah. While not in the lab he is the president of one of the Nation's largest hobbyist clubs, the Wasatch Marine Aquarium Society (www.utahreefs.com). He is also Director of The Aquatic & Terrestrial Research Team, a group which utilizes research projects to bring together hobbyists and scientists. His vision is to see this type of collaboration lead to further advancements in aquarium husbandry. Adam has earned a BS in Marine Biology and an MS in the Natural Resource and Health fields. Adam can be found at email@example.com.
References and Suggested Readings
- Blundell, A., Finch., J., (2004) “Oolitic Sand Analysis”. http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/feb2005/short.html , Advanced Aquarist Online Magazine, USA.
- Pro, S., (2004) “Protein Skimmer Impressions”. http://www.wetwebmedia.com/ca/cav1i1/protein_skimmer_impressions.htm , Conscientious Aquarist, USA.
- Pro, S., (2004) “Power Filter Impressions”. http://www.wetwebmedia.com/ca/cav1i2/Equipment/filters.htm , Conscientious Aquarist, USA.
- Pro, S., (2005) “Canister Filter Impressions”. http://www.wetwebmedia.com/ca/volume_2/cav2i1/canister_filters/Canister_filters.htm
, Conscientious Aquarist, USA.