Feature Article: Coral Coloration: Fluorescence: Part 1
Science is a journey full of surprises and the story behind the current interest in coral fluorescence and pigmentation is no less full of twists and turns. This tale is one of the reef-keeping hobby in Russia and Japan, a couple of fortuitous laboratory accidents, a revolution in biomedical research, revelations and fortunes made, discovery of a new symbiosis, as well as the small contributions of reef hobbyists from other parts of the globe. While coral coloration is today less likely to be the subject of intense interest (and debate) within the hobby than it was just 5 years ago, the situation is much different in peer-reviewed literature, with researchers producing a staggering amount of information on marine invertebrate fluorescent and non-fluorescent pigments. It is estimated that 26,000 papers mentioning fluorescent proteins will be in print by the end of 2006. Not all of these – few, in fact – are of much interest to the advanced aquarist, however, some offer glimpses of those conditions required to activate, or inactivate, the vivid coloration we sometimes see in our captive reefs. Of course, explaining pretty colors in an aquarium (or reef) is not usually researchers’ main goals. The revolutionary use of certain proteins as molecular markers (or ‘highlighters’) in the biomedical field has driven the identification, refinement and genetic modification of many ‘wild type’ fluorescent proteins. Other researchers have studied coral pigments in order to remotely sense (by aircraft or satellite) the light reflected and fluoresced by natural reefs. In this manner, vast tracts of reefs can be examined in relatively little time and an assessment of reef health can be made.
Why should reef hobbyists concern themselves with fluorescence? Isn’t it generally accepted that light energy is a prime requirement for expression of coloration? What if could understand and anticipate responses of a pigment to different visible light bandwidths, ultraviolet radiation or other stimuli? What of the effect of nutrients and supplement additions (such as iodine)? Not all pigments are fluorescent but all are selective in the wavelengths they absorb or reflect. With the recent introduction of relatively inexpensive spectrometers (such as those from Ocean Optics or Edmund Optics) more hobbyists can gain access to these powerful tools (for a review of the Ocean Optics spectrometer, see Riddle, 2006). An understanding of fluorescent proteins (at least their excitation and emission peaks – see definitions below) is essential for understanding the apparent color of corals, since fluorescence can influence the color perceived by the observer. Further, understanding of fluorescence and its effects is essential when we examine reflected light later in this series. Realizing the potential reasons for color transitions of our captive corals might enable us to see these shifts as environmental indicators, good or bad. But, perhaps most importantly to us as hobbyists, manipulating the artificial conditions with aquaria might allow us to alter pigmentation within certain invertebrates and create animals with ‘customized’ coloration.
This modest series of articles will review some recent conclusions drawn from experiments from the world’s leading authorities on fluorescent and non-fluorescent pigments. When possible, recommendations of areas for further investigation by hobbyists will be suggested. Observations by hobbyists can be of great use. It is difficult to ignore mountains of anecdotal evidence – it has been generally accepted within the hobby that light is sometimes a critical factor in promotion of some coral coloration.
In 1995, hobbyist (and scientist) Craig Bingman was perhaps the first to recognize that the rainbow of colors in marine invertebrates shared a common ancestor in a green fluorescent protein; an addendum followed in 1999. All observations have not proven prophetic – it was once very popular within the hobby to associate all coral coloration with pigments found within zooxanthellae. While it is true that light absorbed by the photopigments of symbionts does play an important part in the overall coloration perceived by the human eye, it is generally a mistake to ascribe fluorescence to chlorophyll and a definite error to link it to peridinin, beta-carotene and some other photopigments (the role these pigments play in determining the apparent coral color will be examined in a separate article. Phycoerythrin is a notable exception as it can lend an orange fluorescent color to corals under proper conditions). Articles that state differently-colored zooxanthellae are responsible for fluorescence are misleading. In the same vein, coloration was wrongly attributed to natural sunscreens that absorb and mitigate the effects of damaging UV radiation. By extension, the idea was formed within the hobby that ultraviolet energy is necessary for colorful corals (we know now that these sunscreens – MAAs for mycosporine-like amino acids – are colorless and do not lend color. We’ll examine in this series the recent evidence for the necessity of UV in color shifts and relate this to aquarium husbandry practices).
Peer-reviewed publications have not always been correct either. For instance, Kennedy (1979) described colorful invertebrate pigments as porphyrins (naturally abundant in plant and animal tissues. Porphyrin is a Greek word meaning ‘purple’ – they are chromatic pigments). Kennedy reviewed early work by Moseley (1877) which describes the red pigment found in Discosoma, Actinia, Flabellum, Stephanophyllia and Fungia as ‘polyperythrin’ with excitation wavelengths in the yellow-green portion of the spectrum.
Red fluorescence found in stony corals Montastraea cavernosa and Mussa angulosa tempted Kennedy to describe them as porphyrins as well. Even with missteps the pieces of the coloration puzzle are slowly but surely falling into place.
For general interest articles examining coral fluorescence in aquaria, see works of Riddle and Amussen (1998), Delbeek (2003), Calfo (2005), Blundell (2005), Finét and Lesage (2005) and Credabel (2006). Interesting comments concerning a few specific fluorescent pigments can be found in Delbeek and Sprung, 2005, as well as in Tyree (1998). Charles Mazel maintains a fascinating website on marine fluorescence at www.nightsea.com.
My fascination with coral pigments began when I saw a blue-tipped Acropora (formosa?) specimen. This was in the early 1990’s, and many hobbyists (including myself) were of the opinion that it was practically impossible to artificially over-illuminate an aquarium containing stony corals such as Acropora. So, I was very curious why a coral would reflect light energy necessary for photosynthesis (the coloration did not appear to be fluorescent). I did not know it at the time, but this simple observation would be a turning point in my life. I’m still unsure of the reason why that Acropora fragment reflected blue wavelengths, but my fascination would become a passion in the quest for answers about coelenterate coloration.
The first in this series will present information on a few of the fluorescent proteins found in marine invertebrates. Generally, fluorescent proteins are best viewed under relatively narrow bandwidths, such as those produced by actinic and black lights. However the mere categorization of ‘fluorescent’ and ‘non-fluorescent’ proteins presents difficulties – a protein can be fluorescent in a technical sense but the ‘glow’ may be of low intensity and invisible to the unaided eye. In addition, environmental conditions (such as light quality and/or quantity or chemical changes) may trigger a mutation of a non-fluorescent protein to a fluorescent species or vice versa. This leads us to a point where some definitions are in order before we continue.
Fluorescence. Fluorescence is a phenomenon in which a material absorbs light of one color (wavelength) and emits it at a different color (wavelength). Absorption occurs when an incoming photon (light particle) causes an electron to move from a stable ground state to a higher energy, unstable excited state. One of the ways for the excited electron to return to the ground state is to 'jump' back down, emitting a photon of light. There is always some energy lost to heat in the process, so the emitted photon has less energy than the original photon. The energy of a photon is related to its wavelength, which we perceive as color – higher energy corresponds to shorter wavelengths, lower energy to longer wavelengths. This shift in color was noted by the brilliant, if slightly off-beat, Sir George Stokes, who first described fluorescence in 1852.
See this informative web site for further information.
Emission spectrum. The emission spectrum is a measurement of the emitted energy as a function of wavelength. It is generally presented as a graph (see Figure 1). The spectrum will have a maximum but may also have secondary peaks, called 'shoulders'. In text the spectrum is often described by the wavelength of the emission peak. Some emission spectra cover a broad range of wavelengths, while others are quite sharp. This is described by the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), the spectral width in nanometers at the level that is 50% of the value at the peak. The emission spectrum can be measured with a basic spectrometer like the units from Ocean Optics.
Excitation spectrum. The excitation spectrum is a measurement of the relative ability of different wavelengths of light to stimulate (excite) the fluorescence (see Figure 1). Like the emission spectrum, the excitation spectrum will have a maximum but may also have secondary peaks. The excitation spectrum tells you what wavelengths of light will be good at making that particular substance fluoresce. Unlike the emission spectrum, the excitation spectrum is difficult to measure without specialized, expensive instrumentation. To make the measurement you have to vary the wavelength of the incident light in very fine increments and measure the fluorescence response at each one.
Fluorescence lifetime. Fluorescence is short lived – once the excitation wavelengths are absent, fluorescence decays in a fraction of a second (billionths of a second), and the phenomenon ends.
Stokes shift. The Stokes shift describes the difference (in nanometers - nm) between the maximum excitation and maximum emission wavelengths. Stokes shifts of coral pigments can range from just a few nanometers to ~180nm and perhaps more.
Quantum Yield. The ratio of photons emitted through fluorescence to photons absorbed by a pigment is called the Fluorescence Quantum Yield. The higher the fluorescent quantum yield, the more efficient a pigment is at fluorescing absorbed light. Quantum yields and relative brightness vary significantly among reports, and could be due to many factors including protein purity and concentration, maturation conditions, protein source and so on (Terskikh et al., 2002).
Relative Brightness. Relative brightness is the comparison of emitted fluorescence to that of a standard (such as the fluorescent pigment from the jellyfish Aequorea, or a fluorescent dye). If the pigment’s ‘glow’ is less intense than that of the reference, the relative brightness is less <1. It is possible for the relative brightness to exceed that of the standard in which case, of course, the relative brightness will exceed 1.
Fluorescence Coupling and Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET). Fluorescence Coupling occurs when a pigment’s emission overlaps the excitation spectrum of another pigment and energy is transferred between them via a radiative mechanism (that is, a photon is emitted from one pigment and absorbed by the other – this is a very low probability event). In this manner, it is possible that sequential transformation of wavelengths could occur. Coupling is possible between coral fluorescent pigments (FPs). Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET, sometimes called Fluorescent Resonance Energy Transfer) is a non-radiative, ‘vibrational’ energy transfer between intimate donor and acceptor pigments. FRET is maximal when the distance between pigment granules in corals is <10µm (Salih et al., 2000). When it does occur in nature, energy transfer by FRET can be very efficient.
Photoconversion. Photoconversion is a change in absorption and emission properties of a fluorescent protein caused by incident light energy. Ultraviolet, violet, blue and green bandwidths are known to cause photoconversions. At least two sorts of photoconversion are known to occur in anthozoan pigments. These are known as ‘reddening’ and ‘photobleaching.’ Generally ‘reddening’ describes a process by which green fluorescent compounds are converted to those exhibiting red fluorescence. Photobleaching usually describes a change from green fluorescence to no fluorescence at all. Photoconversion is not responsible for all ‘reddening’. Some color shifts are due to:
Chemical oxidation. Oxygen plays a role in the maturation (colorless to green color shift) in the green fluorescent protein (GFP) of Aequorea victoria. It also plays an essential part in ‘reddening’ of fluorescent proteins in the false coral Discosoma, and ‘greening’ of a purple-red chromoprotein found in Goniopora tenuidens. We’ll discuss photoconversion in much more detail later in this series.
Photoactivatable Fluorescent Proteins (PAFPs). Some proteins of interest to aquarists can convert from a non-fluorescent state to one of fluorescence given the proper environmental triggers. Visible light (of various wavelengths and intensities) are required for photoactivation of these ‘chameleons’. Ultraviolet radiation can also activate certain pigments (more on this subject later in this series – don’t pull those UV shields yet!).
Figure 1. An idealized chart demonstrating the concepts of fluorescence excitation and emission spectra, as well as the Stokes shift.
Figure 2. Normalized excitation spectra of various fluorescent pigments found in anthozoans. Note the distinct double or triple ‘humps’ of Pigments 538, 575 and 583 – the lesser peaks are called ‘shoulders’. Spectra from various references.
Pigment Characterization
Researchers have variously reported fluorescent proteins by color groupings (cyan-green-yellow-red), clade, numerical emission wavelength, or as overt and covert fluorescence. Fluorescence can play a major role in the appearance of an organism (such as a coral illuminated by a black light or spectrum weighted in the appropriate excitation wavelengths as found in ‘actinic’ fluorescent lamps or high-Kelvin metal halide lamps). Fluorescence can also play a part in the perceived color of a coral in daylight – strong fluorescence can ‘mix’ with the light reflected from a coral (This mixing of fluorescence and reflected light will be examined in a separate article). Not all coral pigments are fluorescent. These definitions will be used in this series of articles:
Chromoproteins. For our purposes, chromoproteins will describe the set of anthozoan pigments that do not visibly fluoresce (if at all). This includes the non-fluorescent pink and blue coral pigments (collectively called ‘pocilloporans’, Dove et al., 1995) and purple/red pigments found in some corals and anemones. ‘CP’ is the abbreviation for chromoprotein.
Fluorescent proteins can be subdivided into two categories:
Photopigments are organic compounds that harvest light energy for use in photosynthesis. Also called ‘accessory’ or ‘antennae’ pigments, the fluorescent substances of most interest to us in the discussion of coral fluorescence include chlorophyll a and phycoerythrin.
Green Fluorescent Proteins and homologues. Green fluorescent proteins (GFPs) and GFP-like proteins are those fluorescent pigments not intimately associated with photosynthesis (coral fluorescence is not due to the color of zooxanthellae!). Fluorescent proteins are variously colored cyan (CyFP), green (GFP), yellow (YFP) or red (RFP). These may have some role in photoprotection of the coral host and/or its symbiotic zooxanthellae. There are arguments for and against this line of reasoning. This will be discussed later in this series of articles.
‘Kindling’ Proteins (KPs) are sometimes referred to as Kindling Fluorescent Proteins (KFPs) and do not fall neatly into a fluorescent/non-fluorescent category as they can be transiently fluorescent. The transformation of a non-fluorescent protein to one capable of fluorescence is known as ‘kindling.’ Light (quality- often green wavelengths - and quantity or intensity) is often the environment trigger for kindling. See this site for an interesting tutorial:
Categorization of Coral Pigments
Various texts categorize visible radiation into divisions of perceived color and associated wavelengths. These categorizations do not always agree. I have unilaterally chosen a set of colors and associated wavelengths from one of my fossilized college text books and will list pigments accordingly (these are my articles – I can do anything I want!).
There is yet one more definition – the method of determining the shorthand for pigments. Again, there is no universal agreement. Matz et al., 1999 and Labas et al., 2002 use the genus name followed by a pigment number (I assume this is the order in which the pigments were identified, such as Zoanthus 1 or Discosoma 3). Matz et al. (1999) list two pigments from Zoanthus, and common sense dictates that we call them Zoanthus 1 and Zoanthus 2, yet Labas et al. (2002) list a pigment called Zoanthus 2 that has a different excitation and emission than either of the pigments listed in the Matz paper. There must, hopefully, be a better method. Some papers used abbreviations such as ‘mcavFP580’ (‘mcav’ means the pigment was isolated from the stony coral Montastraea cavernosa, while ‘FP’ stands for ‘fluorescent protein’ and the numbers describes the wavelength of the maximum fluorescent emission). This is perhaps unwieldy for our purposes, and I for several reasons have chosen to use the early (and shorter) abbreviations such as P-575
(‘P’ is for ‘pigment’ and ‘575’ is the wavelength of maximum fluorescence emission). There may be several coral genera containing a pigment with the same fluorescent emission, and the same pigment may exhibit small shifts in its exact peak location. The answer seems to list each pigment, by emission, and list the host animal in a separate column.
For non-fluorescent pigments (chromoproteins, or CPs) the wavelength number stands for the maximum absorption. Bear in mind that it is entirely possible for a single specimen to contain multiple pigments (whether they are fluorescent, or not). See Figures 3 and 4.
It is an important concept but most hobbyists are well aware of this fact – this phenomenon is apparent when specimens are viewed under ‘actinic’ fluorescent lamps.
Figure 3. Though gaudily colored, the purple coloration of this Acropora specimen is due to the presence of a chromoprotein, and is not visibly fluorescent. The coral does, however, contain a fluorescent pigment. See Figure 4.
Figure 4. A fragment of the coral pictured in Figure 3, but viewed under a black light emitting a UV-A radiation at a maximum of 365nm. This green fluorescent pigment hides the normal purple coloration of the animal. This Acropora specimen has at least one fluorescent pigment and at least one non-fluorescent chromoprotein.
Fluorescent and reflective pigments found in coral tissues are generally water-soluble. Loss of pigments in nature or in an aquarium would be expected to be quite low; however, corals contribute fluorescent compounds to the water column (Gentien, 1981). This scientist demonstrated that amounts of fluorescent compounds increased in prefiltered seawater when Acropora formosa, A. cerealis, A. hyacinthus, Stylophora pistillata, Favia favus, Favites flexuosa and Leptoria phyrgia specimens were incubated.
Koh (1997) found that the non-photosynthetic coral Tubastraea faulkneri secreted bioactive compounds to the water column, and some of these compounds could be visualized through fluorescence on developed thin-layer chromatographs. Allelopathic intra-actions and interactions of coral color morphs will be discussed briefly later in this series.
Phylogenetic Classifications
Though still in its infancy, computer software can sort (for our purposes) zooxanthellae and even pigments into ‘clades.’ At present, at least four pigment clades are known (A-D), which contain differing variations of cyan, green, yellow and red fluorescent proteins plus non-fluorescent chromoproteins. Figure 5 is one interpretation of pigments’ phylogenetic tree.
Software of this type is considered by some as subject to fault, but it is an interesting concept.
Figure 5. One interpretation of anthozoan colors’ phylogenetic tree (After Shagin et al., 2004). Clade ‘A’ GFP (found in some anemones) will fluoresce bright green during its transition from green to red. Clade B GFP demonstrates far less fluorescence than Clade ‘A’ during transition. Clade C GFPs from zoanthids are like Clade ‘A’ in that they strongly fluoresce. Clade D (mostly in stony corals) requires ultraviolet radiation or violet/blue light to mature (Labas, 2002). Note: Mazel, 1995, describes a yellow fluorescent protein in the scleractinian Agaricia.
A Listing of Fluorescence Proteins
Table 1 is a compilation of over 90 fluorescent proteins found in various invertebrate species (non-fluorescent chromoproteins will be listed under separate cover). I have color-coded the appropriate fields to indicate approximate color of the wavelength listed. The column on the left lists the pigment’s name. Next is the maximum emission column followed by two additional columns listing second and third emissions (shoulders), if present. The excitation columns follow. (Note: Observed excitation and emission spectra can vary between instruments). Finally, the last two columns list the invertebrate host (in alphabetical order) and then a reference listing for those interested in further reading. I have used the genus and species identifications listed within various papers. Coral taxonomy is in a constant state of flux and I am not (nor do I have the time to be) qualified to revise identifications. This listing is as complete as I can make it with the references available to me. A fluorescent emission peaking at a certain wavelength does not necessarily mean that the animal host will appear the color that the wavelength indicates (individual coral colonies can contain ‘over 10,’ and possibly more, fluorescent pigments, Salih et al., 2004). Perceived color is a result of many factors.
| Pigment | Emission | 2 | 3 | Excitation | 2 | 3 | Found in: | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-445 | 445 | * | * | 340 | * | * | Acropora aspera | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-490 | 490 | 514 | * | 480 | 501 | * | Acropora aspera | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-500 | 500 | * | * | 480 | * | * | Acropora aspera | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-514 | 514 | 490 | * | 501 | 480 | * | Acropora aspera | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-630 | 630 | * | * | 576 | * | * | Acropora aspera | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-480 | 480 | 510 | * | 481 | * | * | Acropora aspera (green band)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-476 | 476 | 510 | 575 | 500 | 475 | * | Acropora aspera (orange band I)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-478 | 478 | 510 | 575 | 501 | 475 | * | Acropora aspera (orange band II)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-487 | 487 | 517 | * | * | * | * | Acropora cervicornis | Mazel,1995 |
| P-518 | 518 | * | * | * | * | * | Acropora cytheria @ Waikiki Aquarium | Hochberg et al., 2004 |
| P-490 | 490 | * | * | 425 | * | * | Acropora digitifera | Dove etal., 2001 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | * | * | * | Acropora digitifera | Gilmore et al., 2003 |
| P-518 | 518 | * | * | * | * | * | Acropora digitifera | Hochberg et al., 2004 |
| P-590 | 590 | * | * | 570 | * | * | Acropora digitifera | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | 420 | * | * | Acropora horrida | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-400 | 400 | * | * | 345 | * | * | Acropora horrida | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-625 | 625 | * | * | 575 | * | * | Acropora horrida | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-490 | 490 | * | * | 405 | * | * | Acropora millepora | Cox and Salih, 2005 |
| P-504 | 504 | * | * | 405 | * | * | Acropora millepora | Cox and Salih, 2005 |
| P-593 | 593 | * | * | 405** | * | * | Acropora millepora | Cox and Salih, 2005 |
| P-409 | 409 | * | * | * | * | * | Acropora nastua | Gilmore et al., 2003 |
| P-482 | 482 | 515 | * | 451 | 430 | * | Acropora nastua | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-483 | 483 | * | * | 427 | 451 | * | Acropora nastua (green band)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 384 | * | * | Acropora nobilis | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-484 | 484 | 515 | * | 450 | 502 | * | Acropora secale | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-482 | 482 | 515 | * | 452 | 500 | 425 | Acropora secale (green band)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | 472 | * | * | Acropora sp. | Karasawa et al., 2003 |
| P-485 | 485 | 517 | 555 | 465 | 505 | * | Acropora tenuis | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-517 | 517 | 555 | 485 | 505 | 465 | * | Acropora tenuis | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-480 | 480 | 515 | * | 470 | 504 | * | Acropora tenuis (green band)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-509 | 509 | * | * | 397 | * | * | Aequoria victoria | Tsien, 1998 |
| P-508-620 | 508-620 | * | * | * | * | * | Agaricia agaricites @ 60m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-565 | 565 | * | * | 490 | * | * | Agaricia humilis | Mazel et al., 2003 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 426 | * | * | Agaricia sp. | Mazel, 1997 |
| P-497 | 497 | 527 | * | * | * | * | Agaricia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-513 | 513 | 545 | 490 | * | * | * | Agaricia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | * | * | * | Agaricia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-557 | 557 | 600 | 545 | * | * | * | Agaricia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-542 | 542 | * | * | * | * | * | Agaricia undata @ 40m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 458 | * | * | Anemonia majano | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-499 | 499 | * | * | 480 | 403 | 278 | Anemonia sculata | Wiedenmann et al., 2002 |
| P-595 | 595 | * | * | 574 | * | * | Anemonia sculata | Wiedenmann et al., 2000 |
| P-522 | 522 | * | * | 499 | ** | * | Anemonia sculata var. rufescens | Wiedenmann et al., 2000 |
| CP-562 | * | * | * | 562 | * | * | Anemonia sulcata, immature P-595 | Wiedenmann et al., 2002 |
| P-565 | 565 | * | * | 548 | * | * | Cerianthus sp. | Ip et al., 2004 |
| P-685 | 685 | * | * | Violet/ Blue | Red | * | Chlorophyll - common to healthy hermatypic corals | Multiple references |
| P-484 | 484 | * | * | 456 | * | * | Clavularia sp. | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | * | * | * | Colpophyllia natans | Fux and Mazel, unpublished |
| P-496 | 496 | * | * | 399 | 482 | * | Condylactis gigantea | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-497 | 497 | 527 | * | * | * | * | Condylactis gigantea | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | 494 | * | * | Dendronephthya | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-575 | 575 | * | * | 557 | * | * | Dendronephthya | Pakhomov et al., 2004 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | ~448 | * | * | Diploria labyrinthiformis | Fux and Mazel, unpublished |
| P-500 | 500 | * | * | 475 | * | * | Discosoma sp. | Gross et al., 2000 |
| P-583 | 583 | * | * | 558 | 530 | 487 | Discosoma sp. | Matz et al., 1999; Baird et al., 2000 |
| P-593 | 593 | * | * | 558 | * | * | Discosoma sp. 2 | Fradkov et al., 2000 |
| P-512 | 512 | * | * | 503 | * | * | Discosoma sp. 3 | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-593 | 593 | * | * | 573 | * | * | Discosoma sp. 3 | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-483 | 483 | * | * | 443 | * | * | Discosoma striata | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-611 | 611 | * | * | 559 | * | * | Entacmaea quadricolor | Wiedenmann et al., 2002 |
| P-487 | 487 | 517 | * | * | * | * | Eusmilia fastigata | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-518 | 518 | * | * | 503 | * | * | Family Pectiniidae | Ando et al., 2004 |
| P-517 | 517 | * | * | 507 | * | * | Favia favus | Tsutsui et al., 2005 |
| P-593 | 593 | * | * | 583 | * | * | Favia favus | Tsutsui et al., 2005 |
| P-507 | 507 | 536 | 575 | * | * | * | Favia fragum | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-561 | 561 | * | * | 548 | * | * | Fungia concinna | Karasawa et al., 2004 |
| P-505 | 505 | * | * | 492 | * | * | Galaxea fascicularis | Karasawa et al., 2003 |
| P-480 | 480 | * | * | * | * | * | Goniopora tenuidens | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-494 | 494 | * | * | * | * | * | Goniopora tenuidens | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-509 | 509 | * | * | * | * | * | Goniopora tenuidens | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-520 | 520 | * | * | 488 | * | * | Goniopora tenuidens | Salih et al., 1999 |
| P-582 | 582 | * | * | * | * | * | Goniopora tenuidens | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-500 | 500 | * | * | 405 | 481 | * | Heteractis crispia | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-510 | 510 | * | * | 490 | 420 | * | Heteractis magnifica | Tu et al., 2003 |
| P-446(?) | 446 | * | * | 380 | * | * | Leptoseris fragilis | Schlichter et al., 1985 |
| P-516 | 516 | * | * | * | * | * | Lobophyllia hemprichii | Nienhaus et al., 2005 |
| P-483 | 483 | * | * | 572 | 454 | 510 | Lobophyllia hemprichii (red) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | * | * | * | Lobophyllia hemprichii (red) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-519 | 519 | * | * | * | * | * | Lobophyllia hemprichii (red) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-580 | 580 | * | * | * | * | * | Lobophyllia hemprichii (red) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-581 | 581 | * | * | * | * | * | Lobophyllia hemprichii (red) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-519-557 | 519-557 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis carmabi | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-520-555 | 520-555 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis carmabi | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-522-623 | 522-623 | * | * | * | * | * | Madracis formosa @ 40m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-534 | 534 | 575 | * | * | * | * | Madracis formosa @ 60m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-532 | 532 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (brown tissue @ 10m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-533 | 533 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (brown tissue @ 20m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-535 | 535 | 587 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (brown tissue @ 60m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-520-570 | 520-570 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (green tissue @ 10m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-520-570 | 520-570 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (green tissue @ 20m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-520-570 | 520-570 | 590-620 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (green tissue @ 40m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-520-570 | 520-570 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (green tissue @ 60m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-519-570 | 519-570 | 590-615 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (green tissue) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-537 | 537 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (grey and blue tissue @ 10m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-532 | 532 | * | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis (red tissue @ 10m) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-587 | 587 | 609 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis @ 40m (brown tissue) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-560 | 560 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis pharensis @ 10m (grey tentacles) | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-519-559 | 519-559 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis senaria | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-520-558 | 520-558 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis senaria | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-561 | 561 | 587-616 | * | * | * | * | Madracis senaria @ 40m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-559 | 559 | 590 | * | * | * | * | Madracis senaria @ 60m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-487 | 487 | 515 | 575 | * | * | * | Manicina areolata | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-487 | 487 | 515 | * | * | * | * | Meandrina meandrites | Mazel,1995 |
| P-480 | 480 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Manica and Carter, 2000 |
| P-484 | 484 | 499 | * | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1997 |
| P-503 | 503 | 479 | 578 | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-510 | 510 | 479 | * | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | 505 | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1997; Manica & Carter, 2000 |
| P-517 | 517 | 551 | 483 | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Lesser et al., 2000 |
| P-505 | 505 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-510 | 510 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Mazel et al., 2003 |
| P-510-520 | 510-520 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Lesser et al., 2000 |
| P-514 | 514 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-518 | 518 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-519 | 519 | * | * | ~505 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-522 | 522 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-575 | 575 | ~630 | * | ~525 | ~570 | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Mazel, 1997 |
| P-516 | 516 | * | * | 506 | ~480 | * | Montastraea cavernosa (=mc2/3/4 - see P-515) | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-582 | 582 | 630 | * | 508 | 572 | * | Montastraea cavernosa (mc1) | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-515 | 515±3 | * | * | 505±3 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa (mc2/3/4) | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | 435 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa (mc5) | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-507 | 507 | * | * | 495 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa (mc6) | Kelmanson and Matz, 2003 |
| P-580 | 580 | 520 | * | 508 | 572 | * | Montastraea cavernosa (mcavRFP) | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-510-623 | 510-623 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa @ 40m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-534 | 534 | 593 | * | * | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa @ 60m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea faveolata | Lesser et al., 2000 |
| P-510-520 | 510-520 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea faveolata | Lesser et al., 2000 |
| P-575 | 575 | * | * | 506 | 555 | * | Montipora (digitata/angulata) | Mazel, unpublished |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | 420 | 460 | 465 | Montipora caliculata | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-490 | 490 | * | * | 420-450 | * | * | Montipora monasteriata | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-610 | 610 | * | * | 570 | * | * | Montipora monasteriata | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-620 | 620 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montipora sp. | Kogure et al., 2006 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | * | * | * | Mycetophyllia lamarckiana | Mazel, 1997 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | ~494 | * | * | Mycetophyllia sp. | Fux and Mazel, unpublished |
| P-575 | 575 | * | * | ~569 | ~540 | ~500 | Phycoerythrin within symbiotic cyanobacteria in coral | Mazel et al., 2004 |
| P-462(?) | 462 | * | * | * | * | * | Platygyra daedalea | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-505 | 505 | * | * | 492 | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-574 | 574 | 550 | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-472 | 472 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-473 | 473 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-479 | 479 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-488 | 488 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-489 | 489 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-497 | 497 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-501 | 501 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-512 | 512 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-540 | 540 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-580 | 580 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-620 | 620 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-477 | 477 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-482 | 482 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue) | Gilmore et al., 2003 |
| P-492 | 492 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-473 | 473 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-479 | 479 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-489 | 489 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-497 | 497 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-503 | 503 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-511 | 511 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-512 | 512 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Gilmore et al., 2003 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-518 | 518 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-540 | 540 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-580 | 580 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-620 | 620 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-440 | 440 | * | * | 358 | * | * | Pocillopora damicornis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-499 | 499 | * | * | 484 | * | * | Pocillopora damicornis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | 440 | 450 | * | Pocillopora damicornis | Apprill, 2003 |
| P-516 | 516 | * | * | 486 | * | * | Pocillopora damicornis | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-625 | 625 | * | * | 570 | * | * | Pocillopora damicornis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-530 | 530 | * | * | 450 | ** | * | Porites astreoides | Mazel, 2003 |
| P-620 | 620 | * | * | 490 | * | * | Porites astreoides | Mazel et al., 2003 |
| P-496 | 496 | * | * | * | * | * | Porites cylindrica | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | * | * | * | Porites cylindrica | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | 420 | * | * | Porites murrayensis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-550 | 550 | * | * | 530 | * | * | Porites murrayensis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-625 | 625 | * | * | 570 | * | * | Porites murrayensis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | 500 | * | * | Ptilosarcus sp. | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-510 | 510 | * | * | 498 | * | * | Renilla muelleri (sea pansy) | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-510 | 510 | * | * | * | * | * | Ricordea florida | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-513 | 513 | * | * | * | * | * | Ricordea florida | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-517 | 517 | 574 | * | 506 | 566 | * | Ricordea florida | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-517 | 517 | * | * | 506 | * | * | Ricordea florida | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-518 | 518 | * | * | 508 | 475 | * | Ricordea florida | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-518 | 518 | * | * | * | * | * | Ricordea florida | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-520 | 520 | * | * | * | * | * | Ricordea florida | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-573 | 573 | 510 | * | * | * | * | Ricordea florida | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-574 | 574 | 517 | * | 506 | 566 | * | Ricordea florida | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-587-590 | 587-590 | * | * | * | * | * | Ricordea florida (mouth) | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | * | * | * | Ricordea sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-506 | 506 | * | * | 497 | * | * | Scolymia cubensis 1 | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-506 | 506 | * | * | 497 | * | * | Scolymia cubensis 2 | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-483 | 483 | 511 | * | * | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-483 | 483 | 511 | 576 | * | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-484 | 484 | 512 | * | * | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-484 | 484 | 512 | 576 | * | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-515 | 515 | * | * | * | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1997 |
| P-575 | 575 | 630 | * | 520 | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel et al., 2003 |
| P-482 | 482 | 462 | * | * | * | * | Seriatopora hystrix | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-503 | 503 | 535 | * | * | * | * | Siderastrea radians | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-503 | 503 | 535 | * | * | * | * | Stoichactis sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-582 | 582 | * | * | 558 | * | * | Trachyphyllia geoffroyi | Ando et al., 2002 |
| P-576 | 576 | * | * | * | * | * | Zoanthus - Mature form of P-522 | Ianushevich et al., 2003 |
| P-506 | 506 | * | * | 496 | ~440 | * | Zoanthus 1 | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-538 | 538 | ~580 | * | 528 | 494 | * | Zoanthus 2 | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-506 | 506 | * | * | 494 | * | * | Zoanthus sp. | Yanushevich et al., 2002 |
| P-538 | 538 | * | * | 525 | 494 | * | Zoanthus sp. | Yanushevich et al., 2002 |
| *Isolated pigments - See Comments in text. | ||||||||
| **A good example of FRET - several pigments in A. millepora 'relay' excitation to P-593 | ||||||||
| Pigment | Emission | 2 | 3 | Excitation | 2 | 3 | Found in: | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-400 | 400 | * | * | 345 | * | * | Acropora horrida | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-409 | 409 | * | * | * | * | * | Acropora nastua | Gilmore et al., 2003 |
| P-440 | 440 | * | * | 358 | * | * | Pocillopora damicornis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-445 | 445 | * | * | 340 | * | * | Acropora aspera | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-446(?) | 446 | * | * | 380 | * | * | Leptoseris fragilis | Schlichter et al., 1985 |
| P-462(?) | 462 | * | * | * | * | * | Platygyra daedalea | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-472 | 472 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-473 | 473 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-473 | 473 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-476 | 476 | 510 | 575 | 500 | 475 | * | Acropora aspera (orange band I)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-477 | 477 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-478 | 478 | 510 | 575 | 501 | 475 | * | Acropora aspera (orange band II)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-479 | 479 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-479 | 479 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-480 | 480 | 510 | * | 481 | * | * | Acropora aspera (green band)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-480 | 480 | 515 | * | 470 | 504 | * | Acropora tenuis (green band)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-480 | 480 | * | * | * | * | * | Goniopora tenuidens | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-480 | 480 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Manica and Carter, 2000 |
| P-482 | 482 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue) | Gilmore et al., 2003 |
| P-482 | 482 | 515 | * | 451 | 430 | * | Acropora nastua | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-482 | 482 | 462 | * | * | * | * | Seriatopora hystrix | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-482 | 482 | 515 | * | 452 | 500 | 425 | Acropora secale (green band)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-483 | 483 | * | * | 572 | 454 | 510 | Lobophyllia hemprichii (red) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-483 | 483 | * | * | 443 | * | * | Discosoma striata | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-483 | 483 | 511 | * | * | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-483 | 483 | * | * | 427 | 451 | * | Acropora nastua (green band)* | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-483 | 483 | 511 | 576 | * | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-484 | 484 | * | * | 456 | * | * | Clavularia sp. | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-484 | 484 | 499 | * | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-484 | 484 | 512 | * | * | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-484 | 484 | 515 | * | 450 | 502 | * | Acropora secale | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-484 | 484 | 512 | 576 | * | * | Scolymia sp. | Mazel, 1995 | |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | 420 | * | * | Acropora horrida | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | 420 | 460 | 465 | Montipora caliculata | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-485 | 485 | 517 | 555 | 465 | 505 | * | Acropora tenuis | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-485 | 485 | * | * | 420 | * | * | Porites murrayensis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 384 | * | * | Acropora nobilis | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 458 | * | * | Anemonia majano | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 426 | * | * | Agaricia sp. | Mazel, 1997 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | ~448 | * | * | Diploria labyrinthiformis | Fux and Mazel, unpublished |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1997 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea faveolata | Lesser et al., 2000 |
| P-486 | 486 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Lesser et al., 2000 |
| P-487 | 487 | 517 | * | * | * | * | Acropora cervicornis | Mazel,1995 |
| P-487 | 487 | 517 | * | * | * | * | Eusmilia fastigata | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-487 | 487 | 515 | 575 | * | * | * | Manicina areolata | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-487 | 487 | 515 | * | * | * | * | Meandrina meandrites | Mazel,1995 |
| P-488 | 488 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-489 | 489 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-489 | 489 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-490 | 490 | * | * | 425 | * | * | Acropora digitifera | Dove etal., 2001 |
| P-490 | 490 | * | * | 405 | * | * | Acropora millepora | Cox and Salih, 2005 |
| P-490 | 490 | 514 | * | 480 | 501 | * | Acropora aspera | Papina et al., 2002 |
| P-490 | 490 | * | * | 420-450 | * | * | Montipora monasteriata | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-492 | 492 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-494 | 494 | * | * | * | * | * | Goniopora tenuidens | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | 435 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa (mc5) | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | * | * | * | Acropora digitifera | Gilmore et al., 2003 |
| P-495 | 495 | * | * | 472 | * | * | Acropora sp. | Karasawa et al., 2003 |
| P-496 | 496 | * | * | * | * | * | Porites cylindrica | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-496 | 496 | * | * | 399 | 482 | * | Condylactis gigantea | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-497 | 497 | 527 | * | * | * | * | Condylactis gigantea | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-497 | 497 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-497 | 497 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-497 | 497 | 527 | * | * | * | * | Agaricia sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-499 | 499 | * | * | 480 | 403 | 278 | Anemonia sculata | Wiedenmann et al., 2002 |
| P-499 | 499 | * | * | 484 | * | * | Pocillopora damicornis | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-500 | 500 | * | * | 475 | * | * | Discosoma sp. | Gross et al., 2000 |
| P-500 | 500 | * | * | 405 | 481 | * | Heteractis crispia | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-500 | 500 | * | * | 480 | * | * | Acropora aspera | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-501 | 501 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (blue morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-503 | 503 | 479 | 578 | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-503 | 503 | 535 | * | * | * | * | Siderastrea radians | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-503 | 503 | 535 | * | * | * | * | Stoichactis sp. | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-503 | 503 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-504 | 504 | * | * | 405 | * | * | Acropora millepora | Cox and Salih, 2005 |
| P-505 | 505 | * | * | 492 | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora | Dove et al., 2001 |
| P-505 | 505 | * | * | 492 | * | * | Galaxea fascicularis | Karasawa et al., 2003 |
| P-505 | 505 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Kelmanson & Matz, 2003 |
| P-506 | 506 | * | * | 497 | * | * | Scolymia cubensis 1 | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-506 | 506 | * | * | 497 | * | * | Scolymia cubensis 2 | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-506 | 506 | * | * | 494 | * | * | Zoanthus sp. | Yanushevich et al., 2002 |
| P-506 | 506 | * | * | 496 | ~440 | * | Zoanthus 1 | Matz et al., 1999 |
| P-507 | 507 | 536 | 575 | * | * | * | Favia fragum | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-507 | 507 | * | * | 495 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa (mc6) | Kelmanson and Matz, 2003 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | * | * | * | Plesiastrea verispora (green morph) | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | 440 | 450 | * | Pocillopora damicornis | Apprill, 2003 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | * | * | * | Porites cylindrica | Salih et al., 2000 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | 494 | * | * | Dendronephthya | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-508 | 508 | * | * | 500 | * | * | Ptilosarcus sp. | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-508-620 | 508-620 | * | * | * | * | * | Agaricia agaricites @ 60m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
| P-509 | 509 | * | * | * | * | * | Goniopora tenuidens | Salih et al., 2004 |
| P-509 | 509 | * | * | 397 | * | * | Aequoria victoria | Tsien, 1998 |
| P-510 | 510 | 479 | * | * | * | * | Montastraea annularis | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-510 | 510 | * | * | * | * | * | Ricordea florida | Mazel, 1995 |
| P-510 | 510 | * | * | 498 | * | * | Renilla muelleri (sea pansy) | Labas et al., 2002 |
| P-510 | 510 | * | * | 490 | 420 | * | Heteractis magnifica | Tu et al., 2003 |
| P-510 | 510 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Mazel et al., 2003 |
| P-510-520 | 510-520 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea faveolata | Lesser et al., 2000 |
| P-510-520 | 510-520 | * | * | 440 | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa | Lesser et al., 2000 |
| P-510-623 | 510-623 | * | * | * | * | * | Montastraea cavernosa @ 40m | Vermeij et al., 2002 |
Transcribing the charts from various papers has been time-consuming work. The charts and the information contained within these articles are fine for our casual purposes. In all cases, the original papers should be reviewed for exact graphical data should requirements go beyond ‘aquarium’ use.
Writing this series of articles has been tedious – sometimes frustrating. It includes information I’ve gathered over the last 20 years (see the Reference list at the end of this article). I have tried to ‘weed through’ as many references as I can, looking for those one or two pertinent sentences that are often buried in pages of important, yet irrelevant, material. More often that not, what is of extreme importance to the genetic engineer is of little practical use to us as reef hobbyists. These articles are as complete as I can make them – there is always the temptation to download just one more paper, send one more email, research one ‘last’ angle. The excitement of discovery is addictive, yet at some point I must temporarily conclude the work, knowing the paper will be dated by the time I finish typing this sentence.
This time, we’ll examine pigments with emissions up to the true green portion (P-510) of the spectrum. With that said, let’s get started!
Violet and Blue Pigments

Figure 6. A beautiful Acropora specimen from the aquarium of LA hobbyist Dave Botwin. Photo by the author.
Relatively little is known about blue fluorescent coral pigments. The biomedical field has little interest in these since they do not work well in many studies due to cellular autofluorescence. In additional, the excitation wavelengths can harm living cells. Solving the issue of blue fluorescence (or blue non-fluorescence for that matter) will probably be left in the hands of coral researchers interested in these pigments’ possible ecological functions.
It is interesting to note that excitation wavelengths for P-400, P-440 and P-445 absorb some of the ultraviolet radiation in a range that natural-occurring UV sunscreens do not- MAAs or mycosporine-like amino acids absorb UV energy up to ~360nm (Bandaranayake, 1998).
P-400
Host: Acropora horrida
- Excitation: 345nm
- Emission: 400nm
- Stokes shift: 55nm
- Reference: Dove et al., 2001
- Comments: No fluorescent quantum yield is available for this pigment. Violet fluorescence is uncommon in anthozoans. This pigment’s absorption suggests exposure to UV radiation (such as that from an unshielded metal halide lamp) would result in maximum fluorescence. Salih et al., 1998 state that certain Acropora species including, among others, A. horrida and A. tortuosa, sometimes are devoid of zooxanthellae within their polyps (the symbiotic dinoflagellates are concentrated in other tissues). In these cases, the coral polyps will not contain fluorescent pigments, but coloration is found in areas where zooxanthellae are concentrated. This certainly suggests (but does not prove) that the pigments have a biological function, perhaps as a natural sunscreen. This particular Acropora specimen appeared blue in natural light.
P-409
Host: Acropora nastua
- Excitation: Not listed
- Emission: 495nm
- Stokes shift: N/A
- Reference: Gilmore et al., 2003
- Comments: This specimen appears brown with blue tips in natural light and was collected at a depth of 1.5m at Cape Maeda, Okinawa, Japan.
P-440
Host: Pocillopora damicornis
- Excitation: 358nm
- Emission: 440nm
- Stokes shift: 82nm
- Reference: Dove et al., 2001
- Comments: This coral specimen appeared pink in natural light. Maximum absorption of coral tissue is 560nm, indicating the presence of a non-fluorescent chromoprotein (Dove et al., 1995). See Figure 7.
Figure 7. Excitation and emission spectra of a blue fluorescent protein found in the stony coral Pocillopora damicornis. After Dove et al., 2001.
P-445
Host: Acropora aspera
- Excitation: 340nm
- Emission: 445nm
- Stokes shift: 105nm
- Reference: Dove et al., 2001
- Comments: Maximum absorption of coral tissue, zooxanthellae and pigments is at 580nm (data not shown) due to the presence of a non-fluorescent chromoprotein - pocilloporan. This Acropora specimen was blue in color. See Figure 8.
Figure 8. Fluorescent blue excitation and emission spectra from Acropora aspera. After Dove et al., 2001.
Figure 9. An apparent example of fluorescent coupling where emission spectra overlap the excitation spectra of the ‘next’ pigment. Although this coral appears blue to the eye in natural light (due to the presence of a non-fluorescent protein), its peak fluorescent emission is in the blue-green portion of the spectrum.
P-446 (?)
Although Schlichter et al. (1985, 1986) do not specifically mention the maximum fluorescence wavelength of their deep-water Leptoseris fragilis, it appears as if the fluorescent peak is close to 446nm (when variously excited by ultraviolet radiation at 380 and 390nm, violet at 400nm and blue at 430nm). The shoulder at ~380nm in Figure 10 is caused by the excitation light.
Figure 10. Emission spectrum of a deep-water coral Leptoseris fragilis. The theory of a fluorescent pigment enhancing photosynthesis was developed around this data. The peak in the emission at 380nm is actually due to the UV excitation source (this portion of the smoothed line has been color-coded violet for easy differentiation. After Schlichter et al. 1986).
P-462 (?)
Salih et al., 2000 note a ‘dense blue’ layer of fluorescent pigment in the oral disk of a shallow-water stony coral Platygyra daedalea. No exact emission wavelength is listed, although it appears to be ~462nm in one of the article’s charts.
P-472
Host: Plesiastrea verispora
- Excitation: 330-380nm
- Emission: 472nm
- Stokes shift: Unknown
- Reference: Salih et al., 2004
- Comments: This P. verispora appeared blue in natural light, and was collected at a depth of 4-8m in Port Jackson, Australia.
P-473
Host: Plesiastrea verispora
- Excitation: 330-380nm
- Emission: 473nm
- Stokes shift: Unknown
- Reference: Salih et al., 2004
- Comments: These P. verispora appeared green or blue in natural light, and were collected at a depth of 4-8m in Port Jackson, Australia.
P-477
Host: Plesiastrea verispora
- Excitation: 330-380nm
- Emission: 476nm
- Stokes shift: Unknown
- Reference: Salih et al., 2004
- Comments: This P. verispora appeared blue in natural light, and was collected at a depth of 4-8m in Port Jackson, Australia.
P-479
Host: Plesiastrea verispora
- Excitation: 330-380nm
- Emission: 477nm
- Stokes shift: Unknown
- Reference: Salih et al., 2004
- Comments: These P. verispora appeared green or blue in natural light, and were collected at a depth of 4-8m in Port Jackson, Australia.
Green-Blue Pigments
P-480
Host: Acropora aspera
- Excitation: 504nm, with a shoulder at 510nm
- Emission: 480nm
- Stokes shift: 70-76nm
- Reference: Papina et al., 2002
- Comments: This emission was identified in a ‘green band’ from a SDS-PAGE separation.
P-482
Host: Acropora nastua
- Excitation: 451nm, shoulder at 430nm
- Emission: 482nm, with a shoulder at 515nm
- Stokes shift: 31nm
- Reference: Papina et al., 2002
- Comments: This Acropora nastua specimen was collected off the coast of Okinawa, Japan at a depth of 1.5m in August, 2001 (Papina et al., 2002). In daylight, the coral appeared brown with blue tips (the blue coloration probably due to a non-fluorescent chromoprotein). When viewed under a black light, the coral fluoresced blue. pH values ranging from 5.0 to 8.0 did not affect fluorescent quantum yield or spectral characteristics. See Figure 11.
Figure 11. Excitation and emission spectra of a blue fluorescent pigment. In natural light, this animal appeared brown with blue tips. After Papina et al., 2002.
Host: Seriatopora hystrix
- Excitation: 462nm
- Emission: 482nm
- Stokes shift: 20nm
- Reference: Dove et al., 2001
- Comments: Maximum absorption of coral tissue, zooxanthellae and pigments combined is at 560nm (data not shown). This coral appeared pink in natural light, due to a non-fluorescent pink pigment (one of a group of pigments collectively called pocilloporans, Dove et al., 1995). See Figure 12.
Figure 12. This pink Seriatopora hystrix contains a green-blue fluorescent pigment. After Dove et al., 2001.
Host: Plesiastrea verispora
- Excitation: Not listed
- Emission: 482nm
- Stokes shift: N/A
- Reference: Gilmore et al., 2003.
- Comments: ThesePlesiastrea specimens (appearing blue in natural light) were collected in 5-9m of water at Port Jackson, Australia.
P-483
Host: Scolymia sp.
- Excitation: Not listed
- Emission: 483nm
- Stokes shift: N/A
- Reference: Mazel, 1995
- Comments: Emission shoulders at 511nm and 576nm. See Figure 13.
Host: Discosoma striata
- Excitation: ~458nm
- Emission: 483nm
- Stokes shift: 25nm
- Reference: Matz et al., 1999
- Comments: This pigment has a quantum yield of 0.46. Brightness (relative to the GFP in A. victoria) is 0.50. P-483 is structurally similar to P-583 (an orange-red pigment also found in some Discosoma specimens. Substitutions of only two amino acid residues in the DNA account for the shift of color from green-blue to orange-red). This pigment was concentrated in blue-green stripes on the animal’s oral disk. It apparently was in combination with an unidentified cyan fluorescent pigment.
Host: Acropora nastua
- Excitation: 427nm and 451nm
- Emission: 483nm
- Stokes shift: Unknown
- Reference: Papina et al., 2002
- Comments: This ‘green band’ was identified as an emission in a SDS-PAGE separation of pigments.
P-484
Host: Scolymia sp.
- Excitation: Not listed
- Emission: 484nm
- Stokes shift: N/A
- Reference: Mazel, 1995
- Comments: Shoulder emissions at 512nm and 576nm. See Figure 14.
Host: Acropora secale
- Excitation: 450nm, with an excitation shoulder at 502nm.
- Emission: 484nm, with a shoulder at 515nm.
- Stokes shift: 34nm
- Reference: Papina et al., 2002
- Comments: Collected in shallow water (1.5m depth) off the coast of Okinawa, Japan in August 2001. pH values ranging from 5.0 to 8.0 did not significantly affect fluorescent quantum yield or spectral absorption/emission qualities. Judging from the excitation and emission wavelengths, it appears from this pigment might be activated (probably by UV or violet/blue light) to P-515, which would change the apparent fluorescence from green-blue to more of a green coloration. The appearance of this coral was brown (due to zooxanthellae) with pink tips (probably due to the presence of the chromoprotein CP-560, a ‘pocilloporan’).
Host: Montastrea annularis
- Excitation: Not listed
- Emission: 484nm, with emission shoulder at 499nm.
- Stokes shift: N/A
- Reference: Mazel, 1995
- Comments:
Host: Clavularia sp
- Excitation: ~456nm
- Emission: 484nm
- Stokes shift: ~28nm
- Reference: Matz et al., 1999
- Comments: Fluorescent quantum yield is 0.48. Brightness (relative to the emission of A. victoria) is 0.77. As most hobbyists know, the intense green fluorescence is concentrated in the oral disk and tentacles.
Figure 15. Though the emission peak in this Acropora peaks at the same wavelength as seen in Figure 14, but they do not seem to be the same pigment. After Papina et al., 2002.
P-485
Host: Acropora horrida
- Excitation: 420nm
- Emission: 485nm
- Stokes shift: 65nm
- Reference: Dove et al., 2001; Salih et al., 1999.
- Comments: Maximum absorption at 579nm (data not shown). Acropora horrida’s polyps often do not contain zooxanthellae – they, along with fluorescent coloration, are found elsewhere within the coral host’s tissues (Salih et al., 1999). This coral is blue in natural light.
Host: Montipora caliculata
- Excitation: 420nm, 450nm and 465nm
- Emission: 485nm
- Stokes shift: 20-65nm
- Reference: Dove et al., 2001
- Comments: Maximum absorption at 579nm (data not shown). This specimen was colored purple in natural light – probably as a result of the presence of a non-fluorescent chromoprotein.
Host: Porites murrayensis
- Excitation: 420nm
- Emission: 485nm
- Stokes shift: 65nm
- Reference: Dove et al., 2001
- Comments: This coral is purple in color in natural light, with a tissue maximum absorption at 576nm (data not shown). The purple coloration is likely due to the presence of a non-fluorescent chromoprotein.
Host: Plesiastrea verispora
- Excitation: 330-380nm
- Emission: 485nm
- Stokes shift: Unknown
- Reference: Salih et al., 2004
- Comments: These P. verispora appeared green or blue in natural light, and were collected at a depth of 4-8m in Port Jackson, Australia.
P-486
Host: Diploria labrynthiformis
- Excitation: Not listed
- Emission: 486nm
- Stokes shift: N/A
- Reference: Mazel, unpublished
- Comments: Specimen collected in the Caribbean.
Host: Agaricia sp.
- Excitation: 426nm
- Emission: 486nm
- Stokes shift: 60nm
- Reference: Mazel, 1997
- Comments: See Figure 16.
