Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools
Log in
Sections
You are here: Home Volume VIII February 2009 Lateral Lines: Probiotic Analysis Part I: Aerobic and Anaerobic Cultures

Lateral Lines: Probiotic Analysis Part I: Aerobic and Anaerobic Cultures

By Adam Blundell, M.S., C(ASCP), Robert Durrant, M.S., MT(ASCP) Posted Feb 14, 2009 07:00 PM Pomacanthus Publications, Inc.
Aquatic & Terrestrial Research Team. While Probiotics continue to grow in popularity, it is important to look at the actual organisms found in culture.

With the increased usage in Probiotic foods for the aquaculture industry, there is a growing interest from hobbyists. If these foods are increasing the survivability of larval animals in open pens, why not in controlled aquariums? Also, these foods are being used to raise crustaceans as well as fishes. Could this be applied to corals and other reef tank inhabitants?

The usage of probiotics comes in a few forms. First of all some foods are designed to be used by the brood stock. The idea- produce healthy adults; get healthy eggs, grow healthy babies. Be it juvenile fishes, larval shrimp, or healthy medusa. Another method for using probiotic foods is to feed them directly to the gut of first stage animals. In this case the probiotic is the food source, or is added to a food source to be consumed the by the “baby animal” we are trying to raise. A third method is to produce a probiotic environment. In this case the aquarium is dosed with probiotics and the water is kept with a certain level of these biotics at all times.

Upcoming Projects

We’re working with hobbyists in different parts of the nation to test out some of the probiotic foods available to the hobby. Early tests include Cleaner Shrimp, Seahorses, Banggai Cardinals, and Clownfishes. All animals which have been heavily tested, and with some to great success. Another area of testing is in regards to coral fragging. It has been hypothesized that by treating corals with probiotics prior to, or possibly just after, fragmentation could lead to reduced infection and increased survivability. One of the real issues encountered by researchers in this field is that showing positive effects of probiotics is very difficult. Like the testing of many aspects of nutrition and aquaculture, it is easy to show what doesn’t work, and difficult to show what does. Upcoming articles will compare the success rate of growing a “batch” of fishes (say Seahorses) in similar setups but with varying levels of probiotics in their foods.

In order to really test a range of probiotics we first need to identify the biotics being used and tested. This first project is designed to let us know exactly with what biotics we are testing.

Introduction

With the increased development of probiotics in laboratory settings, we are seeing an increase in probiotic foods. Commercialization of probiotics is gaining strength in the human foods production, as well as in aquaculture. Increased production in aquaculture has been linked to probiotic foods, with claims that these foods contain Bacillus spp., a gram positive bacterium. This project looked at one of the major sources of aquaculture probiotics, and analyzed the bacteria used in the substance.

Identification of Bacteria (Aerobic)

Currently shrimp farms are testing (with very positive results) the usage of INVE Technologies Sanolife line of probiotics. If you aren’t familiar with INVE they are a large commercial aquaculture company with offices around the world (based out of Belgium). INVE has developed a food source, which they claim is inoculated with millions upon millions of living bacteria. They claim that the bacteria are Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus pumilu.

Hypothesis

We expect to recover three distinct Bacillus isolates. Bacillus is a genus of gram positive bacteria that can be easily recognized. These cultures should grow very well in aerobic conditions, but not as well in anaerobic conditions.

However, given the importance of anaerobes in digestion, we would not be surprised to see anaerobes in the mixture. Determining whether or not anaerobes are present in this mixture is also a core purpose in this study.

Aerobic Testing Protocol

We started with a sample of Sanolife MIC and cultured the material for bacteria. The original mixture for germination was prepared following the instructions given on the INVE packaging. Bacterial culture was performed using standard laboratory practices, which we have provided here.

Materials:

  • Probiotic (Sanolife MIC)
  • 0.85% sterile deionized water
  • Colorimeter
  • 50 ml conical tube
  • 15 ml conical tube (2)
  • Snap-cap tube
  • 0.001 ml calibrated loop
  • Sterile transfer pipette
  • Fastidious Broth (FB) (2)
  • Sheep Blood agar plate (SB) (4)
  • Chocolate agar plate (CHOC) (2)
  • Colistin-Nalidixic Acid agar plate (CNA) (2)
  • MacConkey agar plate (MAC) (2)
  • Brucella agar plate (BRUC) (2)
  • Bacteroides Bile Esculin/Laked-Blood Kanamycin Vancomycin bi-plate agar (BBE/LKV) (2)
  • Phenylethylalcohol agar plate (PEA) (2)

Procedure:

  1. Aliquot 50ml sterile deionized water to 50ml conical tube
  2. Weigh 0.1g Sanolife in a sterile weigh boat
  3. Add 0.1g Sanolife to 50ml sterile deionized water
  4. Vortex well
  5. Allow solution to sit for 1 hour
  6. Vortex well
  7. Aliquot 2ml of solution to sterile snap-cap tube
  8. Read turbidity of solution using a colorimeter
  9. Adjust solution to 0.5 McFarland using sterile deionized water as needed
  10. Add .005ml of solution to a 15 ml sterile conical tube containing 5 ml of sterile deionized water to create a 1 x 105 CFU/ml solution. This is dilution #1.
  11. Vortex well
  12. Take 0.5 ml of dilution #1 and add to a 15 ml sterile conical tube containing 4.5 ml of sterile deionized water to create a 1 x 104 CFU/ml solution. This is dilution #2.
  13. Plate dilution #1 to a SB plate using a .001 ml calibrated loop, streaking quantitatively. Incubate in CO2.
  14. Repeat step #13 for dilution #2.
  15. Plate dilution #1 and dilution #2 to remaining culture media using one drop per plate. Streak plates for isolation. Incubate media as dictated by type.
  16. Read cultures @ 24 hours; perform subculture and identification as necessary.

Reference:

  • Original concentration of bacteria: minimum 5 x 1010 CFU/g *per package insert
  • Strains of Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus pumilu *per package insert
  • 0.5 McFarland ≈ 1 x 108 CFU/ml
  • Dilution #1 ≈ 1 x 105 CFU/ml
  • Dilution #2 ≈ 1 x 104 CFU/ml
  • 1 colony = 1000 CFU/ml when using a .001 ml calibrated loop
02sterilizing_2.jpg

Author Robert Durrant sterilizing the measuring equipment.

03sanolife.jpg

Package of Sanolife probiotic.

05weighing_2.jpg

Author Robert Durrant weighing out sample.

06preparation.jpg

Author Robert Durrant preparing original solution.

07agar_plates.jpg

Cabinet with standard microbiology agar plates.

08colorimeter.jpg

Author Robert Durrant using a colorimeter to measure turbidity.

10streaking.jpg

Author Robert Durrant streaking a plate quantitatively.

11staining.jpg

Author Adam Blundell staining slides.

12growth.jpg

Growth comparison of 24 hour old fastidious broths with a clear solution.

13chocolate.jpg

Mixed 24 hour growth on a chocolate agar plate.

14positive_rods.jpg

A mixture spore-forming gram positive rods are seen in this microscopic photo of a stained slide prepared during this study.

Culture Results

Seven types of solid media and one liquid medium were used to culture the bacteria. Our initial hypothesis was to verify the presence of the probiotics, as well as to locate any anaerobes which we do not expect to find in the sample.

The Key Findings:

  1. The culture did not contain gram negative bacteria.
  2. The culture did in fact contain three species of Bacillus.
  3. Bacillus organisms were not fastidious but did grow much better on the chocolate agar.
  4. The Bacillus isolates grew under anaerobic conditions, but no obligate anaerobes were present.

Final Conclusion

While Probiotics continue to grow in popularity, it is important to look at the actual organisms found in culture. There is indeed a varied mixture of probiotics and in the case of Sanolife MIC the organisms are three different strains of Bacillus spp. Our studies show this source to be active, and without contaminants.

Contact

For questions and comments about this article and the related upcoming projects please contact the authors at adamblundell@hotmail.com.

adam_robert_2.jpg

Adam Blundell MS C(ASCP)CM & Robert Durrant MT (ASCP)CM.

References and Suggested Readings

  1. Blundell, A. (2008), “Probiotics Part I- A Lot of Hype or a Lot of Help?”, Advanced Aquarist Online Magazine, October 2008. USA.
  2. Ciprandi, G., et al (1986), “In vitro effects of Bacillus subtilis on the Immune Response”, Chemioterapia. Issue 5, pgs 404-407.
  3. Green, D., et al (1999), “Characterization of Two Bacillus Probiotics”, Applied and Environmental Microbiology. September 1999, American Society for Microbiology, Vol. 65, No. 9, pgs 4288-4291.
  4. INVE Technologies, Package Insert from ProBiotic Sanolife MIC.
  5. Maza, G., (1983), “Genetic studies on the transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in Bacillus subtilis strains”, Chemioterapia. Issue 2, pgs 64-72.
Document Actions
blog comments powered by Disqus
ADVANCED AQUARIST