Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools
Log in
Sections
You are here: Home Blog Fragmented Small Reefs vs One Big Reef

Fragmented Small Reefs vs One Big Reef

By Leonard Ho - Posted Nov 17, 2011 07:00 AM
Modern aquascaping has progressed from continuous "rock walls" to more open rock layouts featuring many isolated "islands." Science tells us patchy reefs may provide reefkeepers with more than just aesthetic appeal; Fragmented reefs can increase biodiversity.
Fragmented Small Reefs vs One Big Reef

Patchy reefs can promote biodiversity and population. Photo by Derek Keats

Ongoing research is discovering how coral reefs respond to dramatic environmental disruptions (such as after hurricanes/cyclones or bleaching events).  Earlier this year, Kenneth Wingerter wrote an article for Advanced Aquarist about how environmental disruption can increase biological diversity.

The "ecological disturbance theory" is validated by a recent study which shows fragmented reefs attract more fish than undisturbed reefs.  Scientists from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and James Cook University built 30 identical small coral reefs in Papua New Guinea and transplanted Acropora sp. and 20 Yellowtail Damselfish (Chrysiptera parasema) onto each reef.  After allowing these reefs to settle in, they began their experiment:

  • The first group of reefs had 75% of their corals removed to mimic habitat loss.
  • The second group of reefs had the same amount of corals as the control reefs (none removed) but were rearranged into three smaller patch reefs.
  • The third group of reefs had 75% of their corals removed, and the reefs were rearranged into three smaller patch reefs.

 

Two Reefs Are Better Than One

Over four months, the scientists studied the impact of the habitat loss and fragmentation on both the survival of stock fish as well as the recruitment of new fish to these reefs.  They discovered that the first group of reefs (75% coral removal and no fragmentation) had the lowest population and diversity of fish.  In contrast, the second group (no corals removed but rearranged into smaller patch reefs) had the highest biodiversity and population, having recruited many new settlers.  The third group (75% removal and rearranged) fell in the middle of the other two groups.

Habitat loss (i.e. removal of corals) results in reef decline, but habitat disturbance (i.e the rearranging of rocks) actually promotes biodiversity and populations.  Aquarists know that rearranging rocks can help reduce fish's territorial aggression.  But perhaps rearranging rocks on a regular basis can also help our tanks maintain higher diversity levels. We can also conclude multiple patchy reefs can attract more varieties of life than a single large reef of the same mass.  This is something to keep in mind when it comes time for your next reef aquascape.

The study is published in the peer-reviewed journal Ecology.

Author: Leonard Ho
Location: Southern California

I'm a passionate aquarist of over 30 years, a coral reef lover, and the blog editor for Advanced Aquarist. While aquarium gadgets interest me, it's really livestock (especially fish), artistry of aquariums, and "method behind the madness" processes that captivate my attention.

Website: http://www.advancedaquarist.com.

Document Actions
Filed under: ,
blog comments powered by Disqus

blog_sm.jpg

Contribute to our blogs!


Do you have news or discussion topics you want to see blogged?  Let us know!

 

ADVANCED AQUARIST