In
many reef tanks, the only supplements added are calcium and a source of
alkalinity (and all of the chemical impurities that come along with
these additives and, of course, food).No others, it would seem, are mandatory for keeping many
organisms.There is one
other supplement, however, that has proven itself to be very useful in
many reef tanks: iron.Specifically,
it has proven itself to be useful in applications involving tanks with
substantial growths of macroalgae.
Proud sponsor of this column
The
benefit of iron appears to be at least two-fold (and maybe
three-fold). The main benefit is that at least some species of
macroalgae grow faster, and appear a darker, more attractive
green, when the tank is dosed with iron.In addition to the aesthetic benefits, this increased growth
permits the macroalgae to be a better nutrient export system.A secondary benefit is that faster growing macroalgae may
better compete with microalgae, which is often a source of
frustration to reefkeepers.One
more speculative benefit is that it may decrease the likelihood of
caulerpa undergoing sexual reproduction, creating water quality
problems.
This
article outlines what iron is used for biologically, and makes
some suggestions as to how to use it in a reef tank environment.
Iron
in Biology
All
living creatures need iron.Some
get it in food and some by absorbing free iron from solution.Still others get it by secreting special molecules, called
siderophores, which go out into solution, bind very strongly to
iron ions, which are then actively reabsorbed when the species
that released it comes into contact with the siderophore/iron
complex.In many
natural environments, ranging from parts of the ocean to the human
intestine, iron can be in such short supply that it becomes a
limiting nutrient for growth.As a consequence, organisms have developed elaborate
methods of collecting iron from their environments.While detailing these mechanisms is beyond the scope of
this article, the fact that such methods have been developed and
are used at substantial energy cost to the organisms involved,
shows that iron must clearly be of great value to them.But why?
Proud sponsor of this column
It
turns out that iron, Fe, has myriad uses in biological systems.One that is well known to many people is that iron is a critical
constituent of hemoglobin.In
that application, iron is held at the center of a large complex of
organic molecules.It is
the ability of that iron atom to bind oxygen, as O2, that
makes it so valuable.Fish,
for example, have large amounts of hemoglobin in their blood, permitting
oxygen to be efficiently transported from the gills to peripheral
tissues.Fish, however, supply their iron requirements from their
food, so as long as they are getting appropriate foods, they should not
suffer from iron deficiency regardless of the iron concentration in the
water column.
There
are many other applications for iron in biological systems, and many of
these are carried out by organisms that do not generally consume
“food,” such as algae.It
is those organisms that are most susceptible to iron shortages in the
water.What do these
organisms use iron for?
Iron
can readily exist in two ionic forms, Fe++ and Fe+++.This fact is not true of many other metals, and permits iron to
be used by organisms in ways that other metals cannot.Iron is, in fact, used by all organisms in a great many proteins
and other types of organic molecules for this very reason.Many of these applications take advantage of one direction or the
other of the redox reaction between these two forms of iron (equation
1).
Fe++ßà
e-+Fe+++
For
example, if you need electrons (e-) to carry out a chemical
transformation (i.e., if you want to carry out an electrochemical
reduction of some molecule), you can simply start with a bunch of Fe++
that is bound into a suitable protein.Then, when it contacts the molecule to which you want to transfer
the electrons, it releases an electron and becomes Fe+++.
Likewise,
if you want to oxidize something, you can start with the iron in the Fe+++
form, and take up an electron from the molecule of interest.Biological systems carry out many of these reactions, some of the
most important of which are photosynthesis (the use of light to generate
high energy molecules) and respiration (the metabolism of high energy
molecules to generate energy).
Iron
in Photosynthesizing Organisms
As
mentioned above, iron is critical for photosynthesis, and this fact is
at least in part responsible for the substantial need for iron by
phytoplankton and macroalgae.Photosynthesis essentially splits carbon dioxide (CO2)
into carbon (in the form of organics) and oxygen (O2) as
shown in equation 2.
6CO2+6H2OàC6H12O6(glucose) +6O2
The
process is very long and complicated (and fascinating!), but in a simple
sense, electrons need to be transferred from the oxygen atoms of the CO2
to the carbon atoms of the CO2,
leaving behind oxygen and organic molecules.It is iron which in part facilitates this process through
reactions similar to that in reaction 1.
Proud sponsor of this column
Iron
in the Ocean
Iron
in the ocean is primarily iron(III) (Fe+++), because
any Fe++ that forms is oxidized back to Fe+++
by oxygen (O2) and other oxidizing species.The concentration of iron varies substantially with
location and depth, and is depleted at the surface due to
scavenging by organisms.Typical
surface concentrations are on the order of 0.1 nM (0.000006 ppm).When not bound to an organic molecule, iron in seawater
exists primarily as dissolved Fe(OH)3.Iron(III) is quite insoluble in seawater at pH 8.2 due to
the formation of iron oxides (rust) of various compositions.In fact, it is one of the least soluble cations in
seawater.So dumping
in a lot of unbound iron into a reef tank may simply result in
much of it precipitating onto the bottom.
In
most of the oceans, the growth of phytoplankton is limited by nitrogen
sources (typically nitrate).In
some places, however, where there is adequate nitrogen, phosphorus, and
silica (if we are referring to diatoms), the growth of phytoplankton is
believed to be limited by the availability of iron.Experiments have, in fact, shown that growth can be increased in
some of these areas through addition of iron to the ocean.Many of these experiments are summarized by Frank Millero in his
book “Chemical Oceanography” (second edition; 1996).
One
of the facts that arises from these studies involves phosphorus.The preferred solution ratio of iron to phosphorus is between
1:100 and 1:1250 for coastal species of phytoplankton, and about
1:10,000 for open ocean species, suggesting that the open ocean species
have developed better mechanisms for collecting and/or using iron.I mention this fact not because we can use it quantitatively to
know if we have enough iron in our systems, but rather to demonstrate
that different organisms have different abilities to fulfill their iron
requirements, and that iron may be limiting the growth of one organism,
while in the same tank, nitrogen, phosphorus or silica may be limiting
to another.
Note
that I stated that if the iron is not bound to an organic it would
primarily exist as soluble Fe(OH)3.However, in both the oceans and in reef tanks, there are
uncounted hordes of organic molecules that bind iron quite strongly.Unfortunately, while the speciation of some metals has been well
studied in some fresh water systems (such as copper in certain lakes),
the speciation of iron in seawater has not generally been elucidated.I expect this lack of information stems largely from the
difficulty in identifying all of the organic species present, in knowing
which ones are binding iron, and in the fact that the nature of organic
molecules in seawater will vary from location to location, from season
to season, and likely even with the time of day.
Iron
in Reef Tanks: Does Supplementation Make Sense?
If
iron can become a limiting nutrient in some parts of the ocean when
adequate nitrogen and phosphorus are present, then it makes sense that
the same might be true in our tanks, where nitrogen and phosphorus are
typically present in substantial excess over the oceans.There is little published data, however, on iron levels in reef
tanks, and even if overall iron concentrations were available for reef
tanks, one might still be mislead if the iron were not present in a
readily bioavailable form (such as in inorganic particulates or strongly
chelated by organic molecules).
Since
the foods delivered to reef tanks contain a large amount of iron, how
could the water column ever be “low” in iron?In the case of iron, there are several potentially important
export mechanisms from reef tanks.Iron bound to organic molecules may be readily skimmed, depending
on the nature of the organic.Iron
is also taken up by the many organisms in the tank.Also, iron in the water column may simply not be bioavailable
when chelated to certain organics (as mentioned above and discussed in
more detail below).Finally, iron may precipitate in any of the varied
environments present in a reef tank.These include high pH environments where certain additives are
introduced (like limewater), potentially causing rapid formation of iron
oxides and hydroxides.It
is also possible that iron binds onto calcium carbonate surfaces, both
those present as sand and rock, and those being created as coral
skeletons and other biological structures.
It
is not my purpose to prove here that iron is limiting in many or even in
a single reef tank, only that it is plausible, and that the experimental
evidence provided by hobbyists that iron supplementation has significant
effects is not at odds with the scientific literature or with common
sense.
Iron
in Reef Tanks:When Could
Supplementation be Most Beneficial?
In
many reef tanks, it is not apparent that iron supplementation is
beneficial.Perhaps it would be in all reef tanks, and we simply have not
yet carried out appropriate experiments to show the value.Likewise, perhaps it is detrimental in many, and again, we have
not carried out experiments that show this fact to be true.There are, however, some situations where iron supplementation
seems beneficial, and one where it would be detrimental.
Let’s
start with the latter.In a
reef tank without macroalgae, or without adequate quantities that the
macroalgae can be considered a significant sink for nutrients such as
nitrogen and phosphorus, addition of iron may actually exacerbate an
existing microalgae problem.It
might also tip the balance toward a microalgae problem if iron were
limiting microalgae growth.In
these cases, I would either not add iron, or add it with an eye to
stopping the addition if microalgae growth worsened.
Situations
that might benefit from iron would be those where there is substantial
macroalgae growth, with or without a microalgae “problem”.In the case without any microalgae concern, the macroalgae may
simply grow faster and thereby lower the nutrient levels in the tank
that are otherwise undesirable (such as phosphate which can inhibit
calcification by corals).Macroalgae
growth is, in fact, one of the best phosphate export mechanisms in a
reef tank, and optimizing this method may be very beneficial.
One
of the author's refugia that is filled with floating Chaetomorpha
sp. macroalgae.
I
have also heard from many hobbyists whose macroalgae (such as
species of Caulerpa) have grown pale over time and were
not growing well.On
iron addition, the macroalgae greened up considerably, were much
more attractive in the eyes of the hobbyists involved, and were
growing substantially faster.I have also personally never had my Caulerpa racemosa
undergo sexual reproduction despite years of vigorous growth,
but that may or may not have anything to do with the iron
additions (see discussion below).
When microalgae is a
concern, as it was in my refugium a few months after I first set
it up, iron may also help.After adding several varieties of macroalgae to a
well-lit refugium, all was well until the microalge algae
eventually began to coat everything in the refugium.Finally, someone in an on-line forum suggested that I use
iron to boost the macroalgae growth, and that the iron would
help it out-compete the microalgae.Low and behold, it worked; after a few months, the
microalgae had almost totally disappeared and the macroalgae
were growing like gangbusters (at least the two species that
survived the microalgae plague: Caulerpa racemosa and Chaetomorpha
sp.).
Iron
in Reef Tanks:Inhibition
of Sexual Reproduction of Caulerpa?
Since
the Caulerpa racemosa in my tank has never experienced sexual
reproduction, and the attendant water quality problems and die-off, I
have often speculated as to why it happens to some and not others.One possibility is that iron dosing is important.After all, it makes sense that if the Caulerpa is stressed, it
may want to “relocate” to a better environment, and one quick way to
accomplish that task is to put its energy into sexual reproduction.
I
recently ran a poll on one of the on-line reefkeeping forums.I provided eight possible responses and asked people to check all
that applied.Here are the
most pertinent ones to this article (the “none of the above” term
means no iron, iodine, or bromide).
Question
Responses
I
dose iron and grow Caulerpa, and it has never gone sexual
9
I
dose iron and grow Caulerpa, and it has gone sexual
1
I
dose none of the above, and grow Caulerpa, and it has never
gone sexual
31
I
dose none of the above, and grow Caulerpa, and it has gone
sexual
20
I
find it interesting that only 10% of those who dose iron had a sexual
event, while 39% of those not dosing iron had such an event.The numbers are clearly small, but running a chi-square test on
the data shows it to be significant at p=0.038.In other words, there is a 96% chance that there is a real
difference between the iron dose group and the no iron group with
respect to Caulerpa undergoing a sexual event.However, we must recognize that those who dose iron may be the
same folks who dose other things (like iodine, which also was
statistically significant against no dosing), or do something else in
common, potentially confounding a statistical test.Nevertheless, the difference is intriguing, and worthy of
additional study.In my
opinion, it is also good enough evidence for those plagued with such
events to try iron dosing.
Iron
in Reef Tanks:How Much and
What Form?
Deciding
how much iron to add is fairly easy because, in my experience, it
doesn’t seem to matter too much.Presumably, once you add enough to eliminate iron as a limiting
nutrient, extra iron does not apparently cause harm (at least that
I’ve detected in my tanks or heard of from others).I selected a dose of about 0.1 to 0.3 mL of a solution containing
5 g of iron (as 25 g of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate) in 250 mL of water
containing 50.7 g of sodium citrate dihydrate.This liquid is dosed 2-3 times per week to my system with a total
water volume of about 250 gallons.This iron(II) citrate has turned brown and cloudy since I first
made up the bottle years ago, suggesting that it is oxidizing to iron(III) and some is precipitating from solution, but I still use it.Over the past 4 years, I’ve dosed nearly all of the 5 grams of
actual iron to my tank.
Now
that may sound like a huge amount, and it is.It’s enough to bring 800 million gallons of completely depleted
seawater up to the 0.000006 ppm level that I mentioned earlier for
natural sea surface water.Still,
I’ve not noticed any problem, do not know the steady state
concentration, do not know how high of a solution concentration is
actually optimal for my tank, do not know how much is biologically
available by the mechanisms mentioned below, do not know how fast it is
removed by skimming and other mechanisms, and do not know what would
happen if I cut it back by a factor of 1,000.
All
that I know is that microalgae has never been a problem since starting
the iron, and I’ve not noticed anything negative that I could
attribute to the iron (nor have I heard of any from others doing similar
dosing). Still, I don’t keep all organisms available to the hobby,
and if you do seem to get a negative reaction from something, I’d
advise backing off on the dose or stopping completely.
Since
many hobbyists do not have access to the chemicals required to make iron(II) citrate, I’d advise buying a commercial iron supplement.There are a number available that seem appropriate and are not
very expensive.Some
commercial supplements combine manganese with iron (such as Kent’s
product), presumably because the scientific literature has
demonstrated that phytoplankton also scavenge manganese from the water
column.I’ve not
experimented with manganese, but it is probably fine to use if you
cannot find a pure iron supplement.
I’d
also advise using only iron supplements that have the iron chelated to
an organic molecule.The
iron sold for freshwater applications is sometimes not chelated because
free iron is more soluble in the lower pH of freshwater tanks.I’d avoid those products for marine applications.It will likely still work (as many of the studies in the
scientific literature use free iron in seawater), but probably not as
well because it may precipitate before it has fully fortified the system
with iron.
In
many cases of iron intended for the marine hobby, the product
may not tell you what the iron is chelated with, in order to
protect proprietary formulations.I don’t actually know if it matters too much.Very strong chelation by certain molecules will actually
inhibit bioavailability by not permitting release of the iron
without completely taking apart the chelating molecule, but I
expect that manufacturers have avoided those molecules.EDTA and citrate, and some others, actually degrade
photochemically, releasing small amounts of free iron
continually.It is
believed to be the free iron that is actually taken up by many
organisms, and likely iron(II), though some organisms may be
able to convert iron(III) to iron(II) before uptake (the
detailed absorption mechanisms are generally not known).There is a more detailed discussion of this degradation
and uptake in “Captive Seawater Fishes” by Stephen Spotte
(1992).
So
good luck with iron dosing, and happy reefing!
Another
of the author's refugia. This one has hard and
soft corals in the middle and Caulerpa racemosa
growing around the edges