As some of you
may have noticed, Doug Robbins and I will be alternating scribing this column. My role
will be to draw your attention to articles and other publications available in the
scientific literature. Not everyone has the time to spend checking this literature on a
daily basis so my goal is to alert you to items that may be of interest to marine
aquarists. Not all of you have access to university libraries so the procurement of some
of this material might be difficult, but many of you can get access if you register as a
public lender at your local university of college. There is also a lot of scientific
literature that can be accessed through the Internet, so whenever possible, I will include
links that will allow you to obtain or perhaps even view the material mentioned. In some
cases I will review the publication while in others I will provide only the citation so
that you can find it on your own.
A stunning photo prominently
featuring Acropora cervicornis.
Bulletin of Marine Science 50th Anniversary
Issue
National
Coral Reef Institute: Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Aspects of
Coral Reef Assessment, Monitoring and Restoration. Bulletin of Marine Science
69(2):293-1060.
In April of 1999, the National Coral Reef
Institute held a three-day conference in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA involving scientists
and resource managers from around the world to address the scientific aspects of coral
reef assessment, monitoring and restoration. This special issue of the Bulletin of Marine
Science published in September 2001 represents a collection of 49 papers from this
conference covering assessment of coral reefs (health, coral coverage, etc.), biodiversity
and community dynamics, impacts and stressors, monitoring of coral reefs, and restoration
efforts and techniques. The papers all incorporate at least one or more of three themes:
What do researchers/managers perceive to be important needs and trends in these areas?
What are the emerging issues and priorities for coral reef research, conservation and
management?
And what are the inadequacies in current
programs/activities and action(s), modifications, or new approaches are needed to rectify
these shortcomings?
Coral reefs are
often termed the "rainforests of the sea", where the fish and corals represent
the birds and trees. However, rainforest ecologists have found that it is the less
conspicuous organisms of the rainforest, the insects, which have proven the most
informative about the intricate ecological workings of these habitats. As of this time
coral reef ecologists have yet to identify the aquatic equivalent of "insects".
There is now a growing consensus amongst coral reef ecologists that an analogous group of
organisms may need to be identified on coral reefs (be they sponges, algae, crustaceans or
tunicates) before they can begin to better understand the intricacies of coral reef
ecology.
Although all the sessions are of interest to anyone who
loves coral reefs and is concerned about their survival, the last section on restoration
holds the most practical information for aquarists. The following papers are, I believe,
of particular interest:
Proud sponsor of this column
Becker, L.C. and E. Mueller. The culture,
transplantation and storage of Montastrea faveolata, Acropora cervicornis
and Acropora palmata: What we have learned so far.
Borneman, E. and J. Lowrie. Advances in captive husbandry and
propagation: An easily utilized reef replenishment means from the private sector?
Bowden-Kirby, A. Low-tech coral reef restoration methods
modeled after natural fragmentation processes.
Gleason, D.F., Brazeau, D.A. and D. Munfus. Methods to
enhance sexual recruitment for restoration of damaged reefs.
Spieler, R.E., Gilliam, D.S. and R.L. Sherman. Artificial
substrate and coral reef restoration: What we need to know to know what we need.
Ortiz-Prosper, A.L., Bowden-Kirby, A., Ruiz, H., Tirado,
O., Caban, A., Sanchez, G. and J.C. Crespo. Planting small massive corals on small
artificial concrete reefs or dead coral heads.
This special
issue can be found in any university library that
carries this journal, the call number is GC1.B8. You
can also contact them via their website (http://www.rsmas.miami.edu/bms)
and obtain it as a back issue. Back issues are available
for volumes 18 to present from the Bulletin of Marine
Science, P.O. Box 971, Key Biscayne, Florida 33149-0971
USA. Most back issues are sold for $35.00 each and
sent via surface mail. There is an additional charge
for Air Mail depending on final destination. Prepayment
in U.S. dollars is required. There are also table
of contents available on their website for issues
from November 1998 to March 2000.
A large colony of Montastrea
faveolata photographed in the wild.
Proud sponsor of this column
Invers, O., Zimmerman, R.C., Alberte, R.S., Perez, M. and J.
Romero. 2001. Inorganic carbon sources for seagrass photosynthesis: an experimental
evaluation of bicarbonate use in species inhabiting temperate waters. Journal of
Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 265(2):203-217.
This is a rather interesting paper that
details experiments in growing temperate species of seagrass from the Mediterranean (Posidonia
oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa) and from the Monterey region of California (Zostera
marina and Phyllospadix torreyi) under different pH, carbon dioxide and
bicarbonate levels. It was found that at lower pHs (5-6) the seagrass could
photosynthesize at a greater rate due to larger amounts of CO2 being present. An increase in pH (8.2-8.6) causes a
decrease in photosynthesis due to less CO2 being present; at this point bicarbonate (HCO3-)
becomes the main source of inorganic carbon. As a result, a higher pH results in lower
rates of photosynthesis, as bicarbonate becomes the limiting factor. Interestingly, it was
found that at a similar pH the Mediterranean species were better able to use bicarbonate
than the Monterey species, while the Monterey species were better at using carbon dioxide.
The key point to take home here is the importance of maintaining bicarbonate alkalinity,
especially if you are interested in keeping seagrass and macroalgae. Buffers that contain
high levels of borate at the expense of bicarbonates and carbonates should be avoided for
obvious reasons.
Mizrahi, O.L., Chadwick-Furman, N.E.
and Y. Achituv. 2001. Factors controlling the expansion behavior of Favia favus
(Cnidaria: Scleractinia): Effects of light, flow and planktonic prey. Biological
Bulletin 200(April):118-126.
It is a
common belief that corals expand at night in order to feed on planktonic prey. However,
what is forgotten is that water flow and light levels also play an important role. This
paper describes a study conducted in the Red Sea on Favia favus, a massive coral
whos polyps open soon after sunset and retract just after dawn. Their results
indicate that three factors: flow rate (low= 5 cm/s, medium = 10 cm/s, high = 15 cm/s),
light level (low = 40 umol/m/s2, medium = 80 umol/m/s2, high = 120
umol/m/s2) and prey presence (Artemia nauplii), determine the degree of
polyp extension at night, but flow rate and light are the main triggers. Tentacle
expansion was greatest when water flow was high, light levels were low and prey was
present. When no prey was present extension was only 75%. In still water the corals would
not extend their tentacles even if light levels and prey density were varied. When light
levels are too high (above the light compensation point of 107 +/-24 umol/m/s2)
the coral would not expand no matter what the flow was or if prey was present. If no prey
was present, and the flow was medium or high, and light was below the light compensation
point, then the corals still expanded, indicating that the corals response to the
presence of prey was secondary to water flow and light level. The authors also concluded
that since the zooxanthellae density in this species is low, extending the tentacles
during the day was probably metabolically more expensive than keeping them closed. They
felt that their results may not be applicable to corals with high densities of
zooxanthellae and that these corals would be more likely to benefit from expanding during
the daytime.
Proud sponsor of this column
For the
aquarist the lesson here is that flow rates need also be taken into consideration when it
comes to determining feeding in corals at night. Too low a flow may result in some corals
not expanding and hence, not being able to feed. This lack of polyp tentacle extension
could be mistakenly interpreted as sign that the coral does not need to or want to feed.
Interesting
Citations from the Periodical Literature
The following are citations for articles that
might also be of interest to aquarists, which were published in the latter months of 2001.
Corals
Duh, C.Y., Chen, K.J., ElGamal, A.A.H. and
C.F. Dai. 2001. Sesquiterpenes from the formosan stolonifer Tubipora musica. Journal
of Natural Products 64(4):1430-1433.
Fitt, W.K. and C.B. Cook. 2001. The effects
of feeding or addition of dissolved inorganic nutrients in maintaining the symbiosis
between dinoflagellates and a tropical marine cnidarian. Marine Biology 139:507-517.
Watanabe, M., Sekine, M., Takahashi, H and K.
Iguchi. 2001. New halogenated marine prostanoids with cytotoxic activity from the Okinawan
soft coral Clavularia viridis. Journal of Natural Products 64(4):1421-1425.
Filtration
Amirsardari, Y., Yu, O. and P. Williams.
2001. Effect of ozone and UV irradiation with direct filtration on disinfection and
disinfection by-product precursors in drinking water. Environmental Technology
22(9):1015-1024.
Fish
Chan, T.C., Ormand, R.F.G. and Mok, H-K.
2001. Feeding and territorial behaviour in juveniles of three co-existing triggerfishes.
Journal of Fish Biology 59(5):524-532.
Crossman, D.J., Choat, J.H., Clements, K.D.,
Hardy, T. and J. McConochie. 2001. Detritus as food for grazing fishes on coral reefs. Limnology
and Oceanography 46(7):1596-1605.
Randall, J.E. 2001. Four new cardinalfishs
(Perciformes: Apogonidae) from the Marquesas Islands. Pacific Science 55(1):47-64.
Randall, J.E. 2001. Antennatus linearis,
a new Indo-Pacific species of frogfish (Lophiiformes: Antennariiidae). Pacific Science
55(2):137-144.
Tanaka, Y., Hioki, S. and K. Suzuki. 2001.
Spawning behavior, eggs, and larvae of the butterflyfish, Chaetodon modestus in an
aquarium. Journal of the School of Marine Science and Technology Tokai University No.
51:89-100. (In Japanese with English abstract and figure captions).
And finally to
compliment Doug Robbins column last month here are a few citations for anyone
interesting in the reproductive biology of Lysmata spp. shrimp:
Bauer, R.T. 2000. Simultaneous
hermaphroditism in caridean shrimps: a unique and puzzling sexual system in the decapoda. Journal
of Crustacean Biology 20:116-128.
Bauer, R.T. and G.J. Holt. 1998. Simultaneous
hermaphroditism in the marine shrimp Lysmata wurdemanni (Caridea: Hippolytidae): an
undescribed sexual system in the decapod Crustacea. Marine Biology 132:223-235.
Lin, J. and D. Zhang. 2001. Reproduction in a
simultaneous hermaphroditic shrimp Lysmata wurdemanni: any two will do? Marine
Biology 139:919-922.
Zhang, D., Lin, J. and R.L. Creswell. 1998.
Effects of food and temperature on survival and development in the peppermint shrimp Lysmata
wurdemanni. Journal of the World Aquacultural Society 29:471-476.
Proud sponsor of this column
On
the Web
A
very interesting website is the Hawaii Sea Grant
program. On this site you can find pages that allow
you to search their list of publications (many of
which are free) (http://imina.soest.hawaii.edu/SEAGRANT/publications.html)
as well as a bibliographic listing of articles published
in journals, conference/symposium proceedings, and
other publications, as are titles of reports produced
in cooperation with other organizations (http://imina.soest.hawaii.edu/SEAGRANT/bibliography.html).
There is also an interesting list of articles, each
of which you can read online, dealing with aquaculture
of marine and freshwater fish including rearing
certain fish and live feeds (http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/SEAGRANT/aquacultips.html).