Iodine is a
component of seawater that has long captured the interest of marine
aquarists.There are many
commercial iodine supplements intended for aquaria, and a lot of
commentary about what it is supposed to be good for (name your critter:
shrimp, Xenia, mushrooms, soft corals in general, macroalgae, etc.).Others express the opinion that supplementation is unnecessary
and possibly dangerous.Most
aquarists aren’t sure whether supplementation helps anything, and
these folks are about equally split between those who dose iodine
“just in case” and those who do not.
Figure 1.A space filling model of an iodiate ion (IO3-).Note how large the central iodine atom is compared to the
three oxygen atoms.
This article is the first of several that attempt to bring some small
amount of clarification to the world of iodine in aquaria. Together
these articles will expand on the article that Craig Bingman published
six years ago on iodine
in seawater and aquaria.1 This first article will cover
what is known about iodine in the oceans, including what forms it takes
and how toxic these forms are, what organisms use it, how they obtain
it, and what they use it for.It
will also detail some issues around iodine measurement and what natural
sources of iodine are significant to aquaria.
Future articles
will attempt to show how rapidly iodide and iodate are depleted from
aquaria and discuss where it might be going.Whether to dose an iodine supplement or not, and if so, what to
dose and how much, are questions that are much more complicated than
they might seem (and much more complicated than I believed in the past).There are already big natural inputs of iodine to many marine
aquaria, as well as significant exports.With all of the different forms of iodine coming and going at
different rates, with the different forms rapidly interconverting, with
the different forms having different availability to organisms that take
them up, and with different test methods detecting different forms
differently, deciding what and how much to dose, if at all, is not a
simple case of trying to match natural seawater (a worthy goal, but in
this case, perhaps impossible for most aquarists to attain).
While the
scientific literature is loaded with articles that describe how and why
many marine organisms use iodine, it is silent, not surprisingly, on
whether supplementation of iodine in normal marine aquaria results in
anything that the aquarist would call positive.As will be shown below, many macroalgae grow more rapidly in
the presence of iodine, and some require it.In an effort to test some likely hypotheses of how iodine
supplementation may be beneficial to real aquaria, the second article
will report on some studies of how iodine supplementation impacts the
growth of two macroalgae often selected for rapid growth in refugia: Caulerpa
racemosa and Chaetomorpha sp.
In this article I
won’t make a specific recommendation concerning dosing, since the
results of the various studies to be reported in future articles (some
of which are already completed, but some not) will impact that
recommendation.I do
suggest in this article, however, that there are some practices that
aquarists employ involving iodine that I think have the potential to
lead to problems, and that therefore should be avoided.
Iodine in the
Ocean
Iodine
in the ocean takes a wide variety of forms, both organic and inorganic,
and the iodine cycles between these various compounds are very complex
and are still an active area of research.The nature of inorganic iodine in the oceans has been generally
known for decades.The two
predominate forms are iodate (IO3-, with the
central iodine and three attached oxygen atoms; Figure 1) and iodide (I-).As a curiosity, note the huge size of the iodine atom compared to
the oxygen atoms in iodate in Figure 1.Together these two iodine species usually add up to about 0.06
ppm total iodine (~0.5 mM),
but the reported values vary over about a factor of 2.In surface seawater, iodate usually is the dominant form with
typical iodate values in the 0.04 to 0.06 ppm iodine (0.3 – 0.5 mM).2,3Likewise, iodide is usually present at lower concentrations,
typically 0.01 to 0.02 ppm iodine (0.07 – 0.18 mM).2,3
Proud sponsor of this column
Organic
forms of iodine are any in which the iodine atom is covalently
attached to a carbon atom, such as methyl iodide, CH3I.The concentrations of the organic forms (of which there are
many different molecules) are only now becoming recognized by
oceanographers.In
some coastal areas, organic forms can comprise up to 40% of the
total iodine, and many previous reports of organoiodine compounds
being negligible may be incorrect.4Later in this article, some of the organoiodine species
found in the ocean are discussed in the context of those organisms
that produce them.
All
of these various forms can be interconverted in the oceans.Phytoplankton, for example, take up iodate and convert it
into iodide, which is mostly, but not completely, released.5
One research group has suggested that iodate, looking chemically
like nitrate, is taken up by the same pathways, and is internally
converted to iodide before being released.6 This
process is fast enough that in one local studied, the
phytoplankton can convert all of the iodate present to iodide in a
month.Iodate is also
converted to iodide by bacteria in low oxygen environments of the
oceans.7
Marine
algae can also take up iodide directly, and apparently do so
preferentially over iodate.8-10This process may, in fact, be a primary way that iodide is
depleted from aquaria, but that’s getting ahead of things.
There
are also abiotic (nonbiological) transformations taking place in the
oceans, with iodide being potentially oxidized to iodate.These abiotic processes are probably not the controlling
factors of iodine speciation in the oceans, however, with biological
processes predominating.11 In
marine aquaria that employ strong oxidants such as ozone, or possibly
even UV sterilizers that can promote oxidation, these abiotic factors
may predominate.
Toxicity and
other properties of various forms of iodine
The
various forms of iodine have very different chemical properties, and
they should not be confused with each other.In addition to the three forms mentioned above, aquarists also
frequently encounter molecular iodine (I2).Lugols’ solution, for example, contains a mixture of I2 and
I-.It is the I2
form in particular that is the basis for the widespread belief that
iodine is “toxic.”The
I2 form, and that form in combination with other forms, it is
a potent antibacterial agent that has long been used for disinfection.The naturally occurring inorganic forms (iodide and iodate) have
little in the way of antimicrobial activity.12Even a 30,000 ppm solution of iodide (240 mM or half a million
times more concentrated than in normal seawater) is only weakly
antibacterial13In
mixtures containing I2 and other forms, it is the amount of
free I2 that is important for antimicrobial activity.14
In
terms of toxicity to higher organisms, the concerns vary considerably
from organism to organism.Still,
these general trends seem to hold.Rainbow trout, for example, are quite sensitive to I2,
with the LC50 (the concentration where half of them die)
below 1 ppm iodine.They
are not very sensitive to I- or IO3-,
with the LC50 for these species being greater than 200 and
850 ppm respectively.15,16Daphnia magna
were equally sensitive to I2 (LC50 less than 0.2
ppm) and I- (LC50less
than 0.2 ppm), but were less sensitive to IO3- (LC50above 10 ppm ) .15
Unfortunately,
there is not very much toxicity data available for any of these iodine
species on marine organisms.Aquarists
are left not knowing exactly how high the iodide and iodate levels can
get before becoming problematic.Phytoplankton
growth is apparently not inhibited at iodate levels up to 1.3 ppm iodine
(iodide, which they made from the iodate was also presumably high).17These authors concluded “there is little interaction between
iodine processing and the metabolic activity of cell growth.”Several species of phytoplankton were shown to be uninhibited by
iodide and iodate at greater than 12 ppm, though iodide (but not iodate)
began to inhibit one species (C.
antiqua) at levels below about 0.13 ppm.18
In
the subsequent sections, it is made clear that macroalgae often thrive
at elevated iodide or iodate levels, sometimes better than at natural
levels.Whether this
extends to other organisms in marine aquaria is not known.
Who uses
iodine: Algae
The
presence of large quantities of iodine in various species of marine
algae has been known for nearly 100 years.19Some species can contain almost 1% iodine (100,000 ppm) by dry
weight.Iodine is
concentrated considerably by all macroalgae, includingthe Rhodophyta
(red algae), Phaetophyta
(kelp and other brown algae) and the Chlorophyta
(green algae).There are,
however, great species differences in the amount of iodine contained in
the macroalgae tissue.Many
of these species are of interest to marine aquarists, either as food for
fish, or because they are grown in their tanks.
The amount of iodine present in these macroalgae varies
substantially with time of year, water temperature, depth, and other
factors.20,21Some species of macroalgae have a clearly defined requirement
for iodine, or else they do not grow.The brown algae Ectocarpus
siliculosus, for example, requires at least 0.0015ppm I- for vegetative growth and 0.0025 ppm I-
for normal formation and maturation of Pluriolocular sporangia,
though it can survive without growth in iodine deficient solutions.At increased iodine levels, growth increases up to about 0.2 ppm
I- , where growth levels off, and stays constant up to at
least 20 ppm I-.22Laminaria
saccharina, as another example, shows Meiospore germination
increasing with iodine concentration up to about 0.1 ppm, whether it is
exposed to iodide or iodate.That
same species is insensitive to iodine concentration after germination.23
The
red macroalgae Polysiphonia urceolata apparently shows growth
rates that increase linearly with iodine concentration between 0.1 and 1
ppm iodine.24The
same group showed that Nemalion
sp. showed no change in growth with iodine concentration, and Goniotrichum
elegans was inhibited at iodine concentration above natural levels.The macroalgae Asparagopsis
armatahas been
shown to grow optimally at iodide or iodate concentrations of 0.6 ppm
iodine, and at levels above1.8 ppm, the growth becomes inhibited.25
Of
the macroalgae that marine aquarists most commonly keep, there is no
iodine requirement data available (hence the studies to be reported in
the second article).Chaetomorpha
moniligera has been reported to contain 24 ppm iodine on a dry
weight basis,26Chaetomorpha antennina has been
reported to contain 1,100 ppm iodine, and an undetermined Chaetomorpha
species contained 360 ppm iodine.27In a different study, Chaetomorpha antennina and Chaetomorpha
linum were shown to contain 144 and 68 ppm iodine, respectively.28
Likewise,
Caulerpa
racemosa has been reported to contain about 800 ppm iodine by dry
weight.20Caulerpa sertularoide was shown to contain
about 310 ppm iodine.27Caulerpataxifola has been shown to contain 89 ppm
iodine.28In an
aquarium setting,Ron
Shimek showed that 3 specimens of Caulerpa sp. contained 440,
843, and 1083 ppm iodine on a dry weight basis.29
What form of
iodine do macroalgae take up?
There
have been, in fact, a great many studies on what forms of iodine are
taken up. As a consequence of exploding atomic bombs and other nuclear
“incidents”, radioactive iodine can be strewn throughout the
environment, and a great deal of research has been commissioned by
various agencies to study where the radioactive iodine goes.It turns out that macroalgae can take up both iodide and iodate,
with a preference for iodide.5, 8-10, 30The
degree of preference seems to vary from species to species, with most
able to use both.
What form is
the iodine in when inside of macroalgae?
Unfortunately,
asking what form iodine takes inside of macroalgae is a much more
complicated question than it first sounds.Apparently, macroalgae store iodide in many forms, including both
inorganic forms (I- and IO3-, but
especially I-) and organic forms, and the amount in these
various forms varies from species to species.In one study of many species of macroalgae, the forms soluble in
water comprised between 16 and 99% of the total iodine present, and of
that water soluble portion, iodide comprised 61-93%, iodate comprised
1.4 to 4.5%, and organic iodine compounds comprised 5.5 to 37%.Presumably, the fraction of the total iodine that is not soluble
in water (1-84% of the total iodine) is also comprised of organic iodine
compounds.31 Of the common organoiodine compounds found, the
iodinated amino acids, monoiodotyrosine and diiodotyrosine, appear
prominently.32-34
What
benefit is all of this iodine to the macroalgae?That has not been definitively established, but it has been
suggested that it is largely an antiherbivore defense.The suggestion is that the algae is either somewhat toxic at
these high iodine levels, or simply tastes bad, encouraging the
herbivore to move on to something more tasty.The study of trace organoiodine compounds has only recently begun
in marine systems, but one recent finding, that an alga in the genus Laurencia
contains an iodinated lactone(a
metabolite that is likely a poison to herbivores) supports this
hypothesis as being at least part of the answer.35
Do macroalgae
use iodine in other ways?
In
addition to storing it inside themselves, algae use iodine in other
ways.One prominent way is
to produce a variety of organic iodine compounds that are released.These compounds have generated a great deal of study recently
because some of them enter the atmosphere and potentially impact global
warming and other issues that are generating research dollars.Many of these studies are interested in all types
organohalogens (organics containing fluorine, chlorine, bromine, or
iodine) that macroalgae produce, but most of those of interest are the
1-4 carbon organics that contain some combination of bromine and iodine.36
Three
of the most common iodoorganics of this type are methyl iodide (CH3I),
diiodomethane (CH2I2) and iodobutane (C4H9I)
.37It has been hypothesized that these compounds are formed as a
byproduct of scavenging hydrogen peroxide inside of cells.37-39Having such peroxides around is undesirable because they will
react with organic materials inside of the cells.In the absence of such scavenging, these peroxides may do
substantial damage to the cellular machinery that keeps cells alive,
so scavenging peroxide can be an important function.If this is the sole reason for synthesizing these molecules,
then the organoiodine compounds do not themselves confer any
substantial benefit, but in the absence of making them, the
macroalgae may suffer oxidative degradation from peroxide.
In
the open ocean, these released small organohalogens are detectable,
though typically at fairly low concentrations.In a recent survey of the Atlantic ocean, one research team
claimed: “In addition to CH3I, which for a long time
was believed to be the only volatile iodinated substance in the
marine environment, other iodinated substances like CH2ClI,
CH2I2, and CH3CH2CH2I
exist in the range of <0.01-2.2 ng/L in surface water of the
Atlantic Ocean.”40In units that aquarists are familiar with, 2.2 ng/L
corresponds to about 0.000002 ppm iodine.
Proud sponsor of this column
One
very recent study, however, has suggested that the monohalomethanes
(e.g., CH3I, CH3Br, CH3Cl, but not
those organics with multiple halogens or carbon atoms) may simply be a
chemical accident41In their analysis, iodide and bromide may accidentally get into
the active site of certain enzymes (various methyltransferases) that are
normally serving other functions.As
a consequence of this side reaction, these monohalomethanes may be
formed. If that hypothesis holds true, then these particular compounds
may not serve any useful function at all.
Who uses
iodine: Gorgonia and antipatharian corals (black coral)
Another
set of creatures of the deep that use iodine are certain gorgonia,
such as Plexauraflexuosa.42They have 3,5-diiodotyrosine in their bodies, to the tune of 0.1
to 2.6% of the total dry weight as iodine.This iodoamino acid is presumably incorporated into proteins in
the skeleton (stem), but the benefit is unclear.Again, it may be largely an antipredatory effect that is desired.The iodine incorporation in gorgonia seems to increase
with age.43,44 The proteins of many different gorgonia species contain
substantial iodine:Eunicella
otenocalloides 6.5-8.9% by weight%, Gorgonia verrucosa
4.2-9.0, G. lamarcki 3.3-6.8, G. scirpearia 0.4-0.6, Rhipidigorgia
flabellum 0.6-1.1, Euplexora maghrebensis 0.19-0.23, and Plexaura
kukenthali 1.9-2.2.44It has also been demonstrated that at least one gorgonia (E.
verrucosa) takes up iodine in the form of inorganic iodine from the
water column.45
One
study showed that the organoiodine compound thyroxine, and some related
compounds, are localized to certain parts of the gorgonia L.
virgulata.46Most
interestingly, one of the places it is localized to are scleroblasts (spicule-forming
cells) and on the spicules themselves.Further, the addition of thyroxine to these cells impacted the
uptake of calcium, and it is suggested that the thyroxine functions in
spicule formation.
The
antipatharian
corals (the black corals) also seem to incorporate a lot of iodine.The basal regions of these corals are especially loaded with
iodine, with more than 23% iodine by dry weight recorded in two
species.43, 45Again,
the specific purpose is not known.
Who
uses iodine: Tunicates
The
known story of iodine in tunicates also appears to be complex.Tunicates apparently use the iodinated amino acids to make
proteins, like the gorgonia, but they also make some very complicated
organoiodine compounds.47-49Since some of these molecules are vertebrate hormones (e.g.,
thyroxine) it has been suggested that tunicates use them in this
fashion, while most lower invertebrates do not.48 Others of
these iodoorganics are even more complex, such as lukianol B, a
cytotoxic compound that might be made as a deterrent to predators.47Like all of the species discussed above,
tunicates have also been shown to take up iodine as dissolved inorganic
iodine from the water column.49
Who
uses iodine: Sponges
Sponges
are also known to produce a wide variety of potentially toxic
organoiodine compounds.50One sponge of the genus Geodia is known to make cyclic
peptides (geodiamolides A and B) that contain iodine, and these toxic
compounds are expected to exert a protective effect of some type.51
Overall,
the sponges do incorporate large amounts of iodineAn analysis of 12 species of sponges from the Andaman Sea showed
iodine contents that range from 0.001 to 0.085% iodine.52I have not, however, seen any studies about where sponges get
iodine, whether from inorganic iodine in the water column, or from
ingested food.
Who
uses iodine: Worms
The
marine worm Glossobalanus minutus has been shown to take up
iodine from the water column, but it is not clear what it does with it
as no iodinated proteins were detected.53A different marine worm, Lineus rubber, accumulates iodide
from the water column andstores
it mostly as iodide, with a smaller amount of thyronine (an organoiodine
hormone).54, 55
Who
uses iodine: Shrimp
As
one moves up the food chain to more sophisticated organisms, data on
their ability to take up iodine from the water column becomes very
sparse.Shrimp are known to
have a need for iodine to grow, but that is only known in terms of a
dietary requirement.The
shrimp, Penaeus chinensis O'sbeck, for example, grows optimally
when the diet contains 0.003% iodine.56
Shrimp
apparently incorporate substantial amounts of iodoorganics into their
bodies.The shrimp Pandalus
borealis, for example, incorporates between 0.04 and 2 ppm iodine as
iodoorganic compounds depending on the particular body tissues examined.Their roe were somewhat higher, up to 4 ppm iodine as iodoorganic
compounds.57Shrimp
shells and other parts can contain up to 17 ppm by dry weight iodine,
the majority of which is iodoorganic compounds58, but the
values are still far lower than for other inverts like macroalgae,
sponges, or gorgonia.
Still,
the amount contained says nothing about whether iodine is an important
requirement.I could find
no scientific studies that showed that shrimp need iodine from the water
column, but neither could I find any that demonstrates that they do not.
Who
uses iodine: soft corals such as Xenia
Surely,
you say, there must be studies showing that Xenia and other soft corals
need iodine from the water column?Well, I could find none.There
may be studies that I could not find, and regardless of whether there
are studies, iodine in the water column may or may not have a
significant impact on these organisms.Nevertheless, there is no published basis (that I could find)
for many of the claims about iodine.
There
are studies that show that Xenia does contain substantial iodine, and it
is likely that it got it from the water column, but what good, if any,
that iodine serves is unknown.In
a recent publication, Ron
Shimek showed that a wild specimen of Xenia sp. contained 350 ppm
iodine on a wet basis and a captive specimen showed 270 ppm on a wet
basis and 1350 ppm on a dry basis.29Those values are as high as some of the macroalgae, and lend some
support to the idea that Xenia accumulate iodine (and presumably have a
use for it at such high accumulations).
Of
course, accumulating iodine from the tank somehow, and showing that
supplemental inorganic iodine is beneficial are very different.I am in the planning stages of running experiments on the
possible benefits of iodine supplementation to certain soft corals, but
the technical challenges are significant (much more so than similar
tests on macroalgae), and I’m not certain that they will be
successful.
Measurement of
Iodine: Test Kits
There
are many ways to measure iodine in seawater.Even confining the list to those that most aquarists are likely
to encounter, there are still at least three fundamentally different
ways, and those three all detect different subsets of the total iodine
species in water.Unfortunately,
those differences make comparisons of the different methods almost
impossible, and also complicate the interpretation of the data from any
single one of them. Of the commercially available kits, the Seachem and
Salifert iodine kits are the most popular in the US.Unfortunately, the use and interpretation of these kits is
tedious and complicated.I’d
like to hold off on detailed comments about how well they work until
I’ve had additional time to study them, but so far my experience has
been rather less successful that with simpler kits (alkalinity, calcium,
etc.).
Proud sponsor of this column
The Seachem
iodine kit detects only iodide (I-) and molecular
iodine (I2).It
is unlikely that there will be much I2 in an aquarium
as it quickly breaks down into other products59
[to be described in a later article that will include a discussion
on using products that contain I2, such as Lugols
solution].A
potential drawback to this kit is that it doesn’t detect iodate.So if your tank water matches normal seawater in quantity
and speciation of iodine, then it will look artificially low (say,
about 0.01 or 0.02 ppm).I
would also not advise using this kit if you are adding an iodine
supplement that contains considerable amounts of iodate, molecular
iodine (that may break down into products that include iodate and
iodide)59, or organic iodine forms.There is also the concern that supplemental iodide, and
those forms of iodine coming in with marine foods, may end up
partially as iodate.Consequently,
this kit may substantially underestimate the total amount of
iodine present.I
fell into that trap years ago in dosing iodate to my tank, and a
significant concentration built up before I specifically tested
for it.
The
Salifert iodine test kit detects iodide, iodate, and molecular iodine.Salifert is about to come out with a new iodine kit (using a
yellow color instead of a pink color).Assuming that it functions properly, it would be a good choice
for anyone dosing iodide, iodate, or molecular iodine, though it is a
long test involving quite a few steps. It will not detect many organic
iodine forms, and people dosing such compounds should beware of
overdosing.
Measurement of
Iodine: ICP
Another
way of detecting iodine that aquarists sometimes encounter is via
Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP).In
this machine intensive method, a water sample is sucked into a high
temperature plasma.Iodine
in all forms is vaporized and detected equally.In its most sensitive application, the plasma stream is sent into
a mass spectrometer which counts the individual ions with a particular
mass.This technique
is referred to as ICP-MS.Data of that type has been reported to aquarists,60
with aquarium results ranging from 0.03 to 1.2 ppm iodine.
ICP-MS
it is not the most common form of ICP used in routine analysis of water
samples, however.The most
standard way to detect what elements are present is with optical
emission spectroscopy. In the high temperature plasma, the atoms emit
light, and the wavelengths (colors) emitted are specific for each
element.In an ICP using
optical emission detection (referred to as ICP-OES), the detector is set
to the wavelength(s) emitted by iodine, and the amount emitted at that
wavelength is recorded and converted back to a concentration that must
have been present in the water.
The
wavelengths used for iodine detection in a standard ICP are all in the
ultraviolet, with 178.215 nm being the normal first choice for iodine
because of the strength of the emission at that wavelength.According Varian (the manufacturer of the ICP that I used to test
my samples), the detection limit at that wavelength is about 0.6 ppm
(far above natural seawater levels).This wavelength also has potential interference from phosphorus
that emits near this wavelength (178.222 nm).The second choice line at 182.976 nm has a detection limit of 4.3
ppm. (again, according to Varian).So one can see that ICP using optical emission detection is not
typically a good choice for measuring low levels of iodine (as in
natural levels around 0.06 ppm), but can work for substantially elevated
levels (greater than 0.6 ppm iodine).
I
used ICP with optical emission detection to analyze unfiltered water
from my tank (I have routinely dosed iodide to the tank, but had stopped
about 3 weeks before taking this sample). A friend of mine who runs our
analytical lab tested several samples for me with the sole purpose of
searching for iodine.We were not able to detect any iodine in the tank water
sample, nor were we able to detect any iodine in that same sample spiked
with an additional 0.33 ppm iodide [For those interested, we used a
Varian Vista MPXICP-OES,
and used pure deionized water as the baseline.We looked at both wavelengths described above, and could detect
no iodine above the background noise present in the deionized water].
In Ron
Shimek’s analysis of unfiltered water samples from aquaria, he
used ICP-OES.61He
found that 38% of samples had no iodine detected above his stated
background of 0.1 ppm iodine, but other samples had reported values up
to 2.1 ppm iodine.These
results are indicative of total iodine (iodide + iodate + organic
iodine).The samples in
that study with high iodine may have had elevated inorganic iodine forms
(perhaps especially iodate which may deplete les rapidly from aquaria),
or may have had substantial organic forms that would not be detected
with test kits.It is also
possible that some of those elevated values may represent interference
in the test method by phosphorus, which was reported as strongly
correlated with the reported iodine levels.62In any case, one should be aware of the potential for overdosing
of supplements, and even of iodine-containing foods.Using a test kit may help ensure that you do not develop this
problem.
Proud
sponsor of this column
Sources of
iodine in an marine aquarium
Other
than iodine supplements, the significant sources of iodine in marine
aquaria are likely to be almost exclusively in the foods given.Even though starting salt mixes contain some iodine, that source
likely disappears very rapidly (it has been known for a long time that
iodide depletes rapidly, and next month’s article will show some
rates).So only ongoing
additions of iodine are likely to have a significant long term impact.Most calcium and alkalinity supplements are expected to have
little in the way of iodine in them, but I’ve not seen any
quantitative analyses of them for iodine.
Of
the foods provided to most marine aquaria, algae in fish food is likely
to be a big source.Gracilaria
sp. macroalgae are often added to tanks, both in commercial prepared
foods (e.g., some of the Formula foods from Ocean Nutrition, which also
includes additional inorganic iodide), and as an individual macroalgae
for fish (e.g., Tang
Heaven).In one study, Gracilaria
sp. was found to contain 3654 ppm iodine by dry weight.27 So
the daily input to a tank adding 3 grams (dry weight) of Gracilaria
sp. per day is about 11 mg of iodine.That is enough to bring a 50-gallon tank from zero to natural
levels (0.06 ppm iodine) EVERY DAY.In the end, I think that we should be very happy that iodine is
depleted so rapidly, because if it were not, we’d probably rapidly
drive up iodine levels in many tanks.
In
a recent study of foods going into aquaria, Ron Shimek estimated that
the average tank is his study added 27% of the total natural level of
iodine every day, consistent with the above analysis.63Yet many of the tanks (37%) showed no detectable iodine (by ICP
which he stated has a 0.1 ppm level of detection) .61Clearly, the additions are substantial.
What About
Dosing?
It
makes much more sense to give dosing recommendations after presenting
iodine depletion rates and showing what impact, if any, supplementation
has on some common organisms, so I will hold off on that all-essential
discussion until next month.Nevertheless,
there is one important piece of advice that I can give now.
I
would strongly advise people to not try to maintain 0.06 ppm iodine
using supplementation and a test kit.
Why
you ask? Isn’t that what we do for most other chemicals of interest?Well, if we could easily and accurately determine the
concentrations of the different forms of iodine in aquaria, then I would
recommend doing just that.However,
if you combine the complexities of having multiple iodine species
present with the uncertainty of having hobbyists use very complex test
kits that may readily yield incorrect or difficult to interpret results,
the stage is set for people driving their total iodine to levels far
from what they actually intended.I
do not know what levels of iodide or iodate become apparently
problematic to real aquaria, but the risk of overdosing in this fashion
is not insignificant.Both
of the ICP studies reported above found some tanks with substantially
elevated total iodine levels.I
have no way of knowing how those levels got there, but overdosing of a
supplement is one likely way.
Why
such different reported effects of iodine supplementation?
There
is a huge disparity among aquarists about the effects that they have
seen in their tanks with and without dosing iodine.Some say they very clearly see certain effects when dosing iodine
(an effect that often stops when they stop dosing), and other aquarists
report not seeing those same effects.Often this is used as evidence that iodine supplementation cannot
be having the effects observed in one tank if it does not have the same
effect in another tank.Without
claiming that iodine has any particular effect, I contend that such
logic is flawed for the reason given below:
Since
iodine appears to be fluxing massively through aquaria relative to the
natural levels in seawater (close to 100% turnover every few days as
noted above), it would not be surprising if, in the absence of
supplementation, some tanks had much higher levels of iodine than
others.While some tanks
may stay pegged on the low side of 0.06 ppm without supplementation, it
may be critical whether these are holding steady at 0.02 ppm, 0.001 ppm,
or 0.00001 ppm.Few
aquarists can detect and quantify these lower levels.Other tanks may have total iodine levels above 0.06 ppm due
to feeding of high iodine foods.And
even within the same total iodine level, different tanks, with or
without supplementation, are going to have different relative amounts of
iodide, iodate, and organic iodine.So the differences that people report in their tank’s response
to iodine addition may be the result of:
1.The fact that hobbyists are not especially scientific observers
of their tanks, and they may be mistaken about the observed effects (or
not) of supplementation.
or
2.The natural amounts of the various species of iodine present in
marine aquaria without supplementation vary considerably, and so the
different observations reported may reflect different starting points.That is, some tanks may have enough iodine naturally present that
additional iodine has no effect, while others may start so low that
added iodine pushes the iodine level up to the point where certain new
effects can be observed.
Do
I know which effect is real?Or
is it both?No, I do not
know.But aquarists should
be aware of these issues when discussing the effects of iodine
supplementation.In next
month’s article, I present some results of iodine supplementation on
macroalgae growth.Regardless
of the outcome, these experiments have little bearing on how iodine
supplements impact other organisms, from shrimp to Xenia sp., but it
does make a start at understanding what effects one might realistically
expect from iodine supplementation.
Happy
Reefing!
References
1.
The Halogens — Part III: Iodine.By Craig Bingman.Aquarium
Frontiers. December 1997.
2.Iodide and iodate concentrations in eastern Australian
subtropical waters, with iodide by ion chromatography.McTaggart,
A. R.; Butler, E. C. V.; Haddad, P. R.; Middleton, J. H.Analytical Chemistry Department, University of New South Wales,
Kensington,Sydney, NSW,Australia.Marine
Chemistry(1994),47(2),159-72.
3.
Iodine speciation: A potential indicator to evaluate new production
versus regenerated production.Tian,
R. C.; Marty, J. C.; Nicolas, E.; Chiaverini, J.; Ruiz-Pino, D.; Pizay,
M. D.Laboratoire
de Physique et Chimie Marines,Observatoire Oceanologique,Villefranche-sur-Mer,Fr.Deep-Sea Research, Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers(1996),43(5),723-738.
4.
Dissolved organic iodine in marine waters: Determination, occurrence
and analytical implications.Wong,
George T. F.; Cheng, Xian-Hao.Department of Oceanography,Old Dominion University,Norfolk,VA,USA.Marine Chemistry(1998),59(3-4),271-281.
5.
The transformation of iodate to iodide in marine phytoplankton
cultures.Wong,
George T. F.; Piumsomboon, Ajcharaporn U.; Dunstan, William M.Department of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,Old Dominion University,Norfolk,VA,USA.Marine Ecology: Progress Series(2002),23727-39.
6.
Coupling iodine speciation to primary, regenerated or "new"
production: a re-evaluation.Wong,
George T. F.Department of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric
Sciences,Old Dominion
University,Norfolk,VA,USA.Deep-Sea Res., Part I(2001),48(6),1459-1476.
7. Reduction of iodate
in seawater during Arabian Sea shipboard incubations and in laboratory
cultures of the marine bacterium Shewanella putrefaciens strain MR-4.Farrenkopf,
Anna M.; Dollhopf, Michael E.; Chadhain, Sinead Ni; Luther, , George W.,
III; Nealson, Kenneth H.University of Delaware, College of Marine Studies, 700 Pilottown
Road,Lewes,DE,USA.Mar. Chem.(1997),57(3-4),347-354.
8.
Absorption and elimination of chemical forms of iodine-131 by marine
macrophytes.Svetasheva,
S. K.Inst. Biol. Yuzhn. Morei,Sevastopol,USSR.Gidrobiologicheskii Zhurnal(1984),20(4),94-6.
9.
Chemical forms of radioactive iodine in seawater and its effects upon
marine organisms.Hirano,
Shigeki; Ishii, Toshiaki; Nakamura, Ryoichi; Matsuba, Mitsue; Koyanagi,
Taku.Natl.
Inst. Radiol. Sci.,Nakaminato,Japan.Radioisotopes(1983),32(7),319-22.
10.
Effect of stable iodine upon the concentration of radioactive iodine
by marine organisms.Hirano,
Shigeki; Matsuba, Mitsue; Koyanagi, Taku.Div. Mar. Radioecol.,Natl.
Inst. Radiol. Sci.,Nakaminato,Japan.Radioisotopes(1983),32(8),353-8.
11.Model experiments on the diurnal cycling of iodine in
seawater.Brandao, Ana Claudia M.; Wagener, Angela de Luca;
Wagener, Klaus.Dep.
Quimica,Pontificia Univ.
Catolica,Rio de Janeiro,Brazil.Mar.
Chem.(1994),46(1-2),25-31.
12.
Antibacterial properties of starch iodide and of its components.Mokhnach,
V. O.; Litvinov, M. A.; Borisov, L. B.; Matyko, N. A.;
Smirnova-Ikonnikova, M. I.V. L. Komarov Botan. Inst.,Leningrad,Mikrobiologiya(1960),29451-4.
13.
Preservation of potassium iodide eye drops with thiomersal.Stock, Wilfried; Klaus, Uwe.Zentrallab. Deutscher Apotheker,Eschborn,Fed. Rep.
Ger.Pharmazeutische
Zeitung(1982),127(13),733-6.
14.
Control of the amount of free molecular iodine in iodine germicides.Hickey,
John; Panicucci, Rick; Duan, Yongjun; Dinehart, Kirk; Murphy, Joe;
Kessler, Jack; Gottardi, Waldemar.Symbollon Corporation,Framingham,MA,USA.Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology(1997),49(12),1195-1199.
15.
Toxicity of iodine, iodide, and iodate to Daphnia magna and rainbow
trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).Laverock, M. J.; Stephenson, M.; Macdonald, C. R.AECL Res.,Whiteshell Laboratories,Pinawa,MB,Can.Archives
of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology(1995),29(3),344-50.
16.
Effect of potassium iodide and bromide on rainbow trout.Goreva, V. A.Saratov. Otd.,GosNIORKh,Saratovo,USSR.Gidrobiologicheskii Zhurnal(1984),20(5),50-4.
17.
The transformation of iodate to iodide in marine phytoplankton
cultures.Wong, George T. F.; Piumsomboon, Ajcharaporn U.; Dunstan,
William M.Department
of Ocean, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,Old Dominion University,Norfolk,VA,USA.Marine Ecology: Progress Series(2002),23727-39.
18.
Effects of iodide and iodate ions on marine phytoplankton.Fuse,
Hiroyuki; Takimura, Osamu; Yamaoka, Yukiho.Gov. Ind. Res. Inst.,Kure,Japan.Editor(s):
Okaichi, Tomotoshi; Anderson, Donald M.; Nemoto, Takahisa.Red Tides:Biol.,
Environ. Sci., Toxicol., Proc. Int. Symp., 1st(1989),Meeting Date
1987,229-32.Publisher: Elsevier,New
York, N. Y
19.Biochemistry of iodine. I. The distribution of iodine in plant
and animal tissues.Cameron,
A. T.Univ. Manitoba,J. Biol. Chem.(1914),18335-80.
20.
Seasonal variation, bioaccumulation and prevention of loss of iodine
in seaweeds.Mairh,
O. P.; Ramavat, B. K.; Tewari, A.; Oza, R. M.; Joshi, H. V.Cent. Salt Mar. Chem. Res. Inst.,Bhavnagar,India.Phytochemistry(1989),28(12),3307-10.
21.Biological aspects of iodine behavior during interaction of
algae with sea water.Kravtsova,
Yu. Yu.; Saenko, G. N.USSR.Editor(s):
Krasnov, E. V.Vzaimodeistvie
Vodoi Zhivym Veshchestvom, Tr. Mezhdunar. Simp.(1979),Meeting Date
1975,1146-52.
22.
Influence of iodine on growth and development of the brown alga
Ectocarpus siliculosus in axenic cultures.Woolery, Marti L.; Lewin, Ralph A.Scripps Inst. Oceanogr.,Univ. California,La
Jolla, CA,USA.Phycologia(1973),12(3-4),131-8.
23.Environmental control of gametogenesis in Laminaria saccharina.III.Effects of
different iodine concentrations and chloride and iodide ratios.Hsiao, Stephen I.; Druehl, Louis D.Dep. Biol. Sci.,Simon Fraser Univ.,Burnaby,BC,Can.Canadian Journal of Botany(1973),51(5),989-97.
24.
Influence of iodine and bromine on growth of some red algae in axenic
culture.Fries,
Lisbeth.Univ. Uppsala,Swed.Physiol.
Plantarum(1966),19(3),800-8.
25.Effects of iodine on the growth of the fronds of Asparagopsis
armata (Rhodophyceae, Bonnemaisoniales) in culture from spear bearing
branches.Codomier, Louis; Segot, Madeleine; Combaut, Georges.Groupe Rech. Biol. Chim. Veg. Mar.,Cent. Univ. Perpignan,Perpignan,Fr.Giornale
Botanico Italiano(1979),113(5-6),387-93.
26
Concentration of iodine and bromine by plants in the seas of Japan
and Okhotsk.Saenko, G. N.; Kravtsova, I. I.; Ivanenko, V. V.;
Sheludko, S. I.Far
East Sci. Cent.,Inst.
Chem.,Vladivostok,USSR.Marine Biology (Berlin, Germany)(1978),47(3),243-50.
27.
Distribution of iodine in marine algae of Goa region.Solimabi;
Das, B.Natl. Inst. Oceanogr.,Goa, India.Indian Journal of Marine Sciences(1977),6(2),180-1.
28.Instrumental neutron activation analysis of iodine levels in
fourteen seaweed species from the coastal belt of Ghana.Serfor-Armah,
Y.; Nyarko, B. J. B.; Carboo, D.; Osae, E. K.; Anim-Sampong, S.; Akaho,
E. H. K.Chemistry Department, National Nuclear Research
Institute,Ghana Atomic
Energy Commission,Legon-Accra,Ghana.Journal
of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry(2000),245(2),443-446.
29.Down the Drain; Exports from Reef Aquaria by Ronald L.
Shimek
30.Absorption and elimination of chemical forms of iodine-131 by
marine macrophytes.Svetasheva,
S. K.Inst. Biol. Yuzhn. Morei,Sevastopol,USSR.Gidrobiologicheskii Zhurnal(1984),20(4),94-6.
31.
Determination of chemical species of iodine in some seaweeds (I).Hou,
Xiaolin; Chai, Chifang; Qian, Qinfang; Yan, Xiaojun; Fan, Xiao.Laboratory Nuclear Analysis Techniques, Academia Sinica,Institute High Energy Physics,Beijing,Peop. Rep.
China.Science
of the Total Environment(1997),204(3),215-221.
32.Fate of iodides taken up by various marine algae and
characterization of the iodinated amino acids in the hydrolysates.Andre, S.Lab. Biochim. Gen. Comp.,Coll.
France,Paris,Fr.Comptes
Rendus des Seances de la Societe de Biologie et de Ses Filiales(1971),165(12),2293-8.
33.Iodine-containing complexes of the Black Sea alga Phyllophora
nervosa.Gazha, P. A.; Yunusov, T. S.; Shadrina, T. Yu.;
Andrianov, A. M.Inst.
Khim. Rastit. Veshchestv,Tashkent,USSR.Khimiya
Prirodnykh Soedinenii(1983),(6),772-6.
34.Haloforms in the essential oil of the alga Asparagopsis
taxiformis.Burreson,
B. J.; Moore, Richard E.; Roller, Peter.Dep. Chem.,Univ.
Hawaii,Honolulu,HI,USA.Tetrahedron
Letters(1975),(7),473-6.
35.
New iodolactone from Laurencia majuscula.Su,
Jing-Yu; Xu, Xiao-Hua; Zeng, Long-Mei; Wang, Chao-Jie.Dep. Chem.,Zhongshan
Univ.,Canton,Peop.
Rep. China.Gaodeng
Xuexiao Huaxue Xuebao(1997),18(8),1333-1334.
36.
Marine macroalgae in
polar regions as natural sources for volatile organohalogens.Laturnus,
Frank.Department of Plant Biology and Biogeochemistry,Riso National Laboratory,Roskilde,Den.Environmental
Science and Pollution Research International(2001),8(2),103-108.
37.
The involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the production of volatile
halogenated compounds by Meristiella gelidium.Collen, Jonas; Ekdahl, Anja; Abrahamsson, Katarina;
Pedersen, Marianne.Department
of Physiological Botany,Uppsala
University,Uppsala,Swed.Phytochemistry(1994),36(5),1197-1202.
38.Production of halocarbons from seaweeds: an oxidative stress
reaction?Pedersen,
Marianne; Collen, J.; Abrahamsson, K.; Ekdahl, A.Department of Physiological Botany,Uppsala University,Uppsala,Swed.Scientia
Marina(1996),60(Supl. 1, Underwater Light and Algal Photobiology),257-263.
39.Release of Volatile Iodinated C1-C4 Hydrocarbons by Marine
Macroalgae from Various Climate Zones.Giese,
Bernd; Laturnus, Frank; Adams, Freddy C.; Wiencke, Christian.Department of Chemistry,University
of Antwerp (UIA),Wilrijk,Belg.Environmental
Science and Technology(1999),33(14),2432-2439.
40.Biogenic volatile organoiodine and organobromine hydrocarbons
in the Atlantic Ocean from 42°N to 72°S.Schall,
C.; Heumann, K. G.; Kirst, G. O.Institute Inorganic Analytical Chemistry, Johannes
Gutenberg-University,Mainz,Germany.Fresenius'
Journal of Analytical Chemistry(1997),359(3),298-305.
41.Phytogenesis of halomethanes: A product of selection or a
metabolic accident?Manley,
Steven L.Department of Biological Sciences,California State University,Long Beach,CA,USA.Biogeochemistry(2002),60(2),163-180.
42Iodine in gorgonian corals.Sugimoto,
Koichi.J. Biol. Chem.(1928),76723-8.
43.
Chemical changes accompanying maturation of the connective tissue
skeletons of gorgonian and antipatharian corals.Goldberg, W. M.