Like the relationship between alkalinity and calcium, the relationship between
alkalinity and pH takes many forms. One of the most important of these is simply thatalkalinity
is defined as the amount of acid necessary to change the pH of the sample
to a specific value. Beyond that relationship, however, is where the interesting tidbits
lie. How does atmospheric carbon dioxide impact pH in my tank? What is the relationship
between alkalinity supplementation and pH? How does the alkalinity impact pH stability in
reef tanks? What is a buffer and what does it have to do with alkalinity? This article
will endeavor to clarify these relationships.
Proud sponsor of this column
The Mathematical
Relationship Between Carbonate Alkalinity and pH
It turns out that there is an exact
mathematical relationship between pH and carbonate alkalinity for any aqueous system in
equilibrium with the atmosphere. In this context, carbonate alkalinity is defined as the
alkalinity provided by carbonate and bicarbonate, and does not include the minor
contributions to alkalinity provided by borate (B(OH)4-),
silicate (Si(OH)3O-), phosphate (H2PO4-,
HPO4--, and PO4---), hydroxide ( OH-
and MgOH+) and the negative contribution from protons (H+, HF, and
HSO4-). In normal seawater at pH 8.0, the carbonate alkalinity
accounts for 96.5% of the total alkalinity, so for most purposes, the contributions from
these other ions can be ignored. Two situations where they cannot be ignored, however, are
when borate is artificially high, as is true in some commercial salt mixes, and when one
is considering the buffer intensity, where borate is significant even in normal seawater
(discussed below).
Carbonate alkalinity (Ac) is
mathematically defined as
1.
Where [X] means the concentration of
species X. Carbonate (CO3--) is counted twice because it contributes
two units of alkalinity for each unit of concentration. The relationship between the
amount of bicarbonate and carbonate to pH is well defined if the system is at equilibrium
with the atmosphere. Substituting these known relationships into equation 1, we get:
2.
where pCO2 is the
concentration CO2 in the air. Current carbon dioxide concentrations are around 350 ppm
and have been rising with time, from less than 300 ppm in preindustrial times. KH is the
Henrys law constant for CO2 (which describes the solubility of CO2
in water from the air to form carbonic acid, H2CO3), K1
is the first dissociation constant for H2CO3 (describing the
dissociation of H2CO3 to HCO3-), and K2 is the
second dissociation constant for H2CO3 (describing the dissociation
of HCO3- to CO3--).
It is not easy to look at equation 2 and see
any particular relationship between alkalinity and pH, but it is easy to see graphically.
Using equations 2 and 3 (the definition of pH), we can plot the relationship graphically
(Figure 1).
Figure 1. The theoretical
relationship between carbonate alkalinity and pH for seawater (blue) and freshwater (red)
equilibrated with the atmosphere (350 ppm
carbon dioxide) using equations 2 and 3.
3. pH = -log [H+]
Note that for purposes of this article, I am
ignoring the fact that there are several different pH scales used in seawater that vary on
the order of 0.1 to 0.2 pH units, and that activity coefficients are required to properly
use such equations. These are fascinating ideas in and of themselves, and may be discussed
in detail in future columns, but are unnecessary to understand the fundamental
relationship between alkalinity and pH.
There are two things readily apparent from
Figure 1. The first is that the alkalinity rises sharply as pH is raised. This becomes
especially true above pH 8 in salt water, where there becomes an appreciable concentration
of carbonate. Why exactly is this true? Heres a simple non-quantitative way to think
about it:
Carbon dioxide has a specific solubility in
water as carbonic acid (H2CO3). Regardless of pH, at a given salt
concentration this carbonic acid concentration is always the same. All that determines the
concentration of H2CO3 is the amount of CO2 in the air.
Further, at any given pH there is an exact
mathematical relationship between H2CO3 and both bicarbonate and
carbonate. These relationships are, in fact, those used to derive equation 2 (the first
term in equation 2 is bicarbonate, and the second term is carbonate).
For example, at a pH of about 9.3 in
freshwater (about 8.4 in seawater) the carbonate concentration is 100 times that of the
carbonic acid. At higher pH this multiplier rises, and there is consequently more
bicarbonate and carbonate present. More bicarbonate and carbonate results in higher
alkalinity, as is shown in Figure 1.
A second interesting feature of Figure 1 is
that at any pH, the alkalinity of seawater is much higher than that in fresh water. The
reason in simple terms is that the multipliers described above are larger in salt water.
The more quantitative reason is that the dissociation constants are higher in salt water.
Higher dissociation constants force a higher concentration of bicarbonate and carbonate to
be present for a given concentration of carbonic acid. Hence, they result in a higher
alkalinity.
A third feature of this relationship involves
the pH of seawater as the ambient CO2 level rises. If CO2 is allowed
to double (Figure 2), the pH drops by 0.3 pH units (assuming that the alkalinity is
unchanged). Consequently, in the future, the pH of seawater may actually drop into the
upper 7s from the 8.0 to 8.2 range present today.
Figure 2. The theoretical
relationship between carbonate alkalinity and pH for seawater in equilibrium for
preindustrial air (green; 278 ppm carbon dioxide), current air (blue; 350 ppm carbon
dioxide) and possible future air (red; 700 ppm carbon dioxide) using equations 2 and 3.
pH vs. Alkalinity in Reef Tanks
At the start of the last section, it was
pointed out that "there is an exact mathematical relationship between pH and
carbonate alkalinity for any aqueous system in equilibrium with the atmosphere".
An important point to keep in mind is that the relationship will be altered slightly if
the tank is not in equilibrium with the air. Specifically, reef tanks are often not in
equilibrium with the air, making the internal pCO2 for the tank something
different than the surrounding air.
For example, tanks using limewater can have a
pH value of 8.5 with a total alkalinity of only 3 meq/L. Looking at Figure 2, this puts
them off of the theoretical relationship for seawater in ambient air. The fundamental
explanation is that the tank is deficient in CO2. In effect, the tank has an
internal pCO2 that is more like that for the preindustrial air with 273 ppm CO2
(Figure 2). In this case, driving more CO2 from "normal air" into the
water would lower the pH to about 8.2-8.3 while maintaining the same alkalinity.
Likewise, tanks that use calcium
carbonate/carbon dioxide reactors often have a pH of 8.0 with an alkalinity of 3 meq/L (or
more). Again, that set of values falls off of the theoretical curve shown in Figure 2. In
this case, the tank has an artificially high internal pCO2 of more than twice
"normal air". Driving more CO2 from the tank into "normal
air" would raise the pH to about 8.2-8.3 while maintaining the same alkalinity.
A third way that reef tanks can present
unusual combinations of pH and alkalinity is if the tank is in an environment where the
ambient CO2 is far from normal. Rarely would such a situation involve reduced
CO2, but homes and businesses are frequently elevated with respect to CO2.
Such levels as those represented by the 700-ppm line in Figure 2 are frequently
encountered by aquarists, especially those living in newer, "tighter" homes (and
some have proven this fact to themselves with carbon dioxide detectors). Aquarists that
experience chronic low pH despite adequate alkalinity and aeration may do so because their
homes have such elevated levels of carbon dioxide. Many of these aquarists have found that
the pH of their tanks rises substantially by simply leaving a window near the tank open to
permit better exchange with exterior, "normal" air.
Finally, pCO2 fluctuates within a
reef tank every day because of the activities of the organisms present. Some are producing
CO2 as a waste product of metabolism, including all organisms in the dark.
Those that photosynthesize consume CO2 during the day. As a consequence, the
pCO2 rises during the night and declines during the day. This change in pCO2
is largely responsible for the pH fluctuation over the course of a day.
For all of these reasons, a tank may move
between the red and green lines of Figure 2 (or further in extreme cases) without the
alkalinity changing at all. Typical diurnal pH fluctuations in a reef tank (and in some
natural lagoons, for that matter) are about 0.1 to 0.3 pH units. For tanks with a larger
fluctuation than about 0.3 pH units, the aquarist might want to look for ways to minimize
the fluctuation. This minimization is best accomplished by maximizing the gas exchange
between the tank and "normal" air through better circulation, better aeration
through devices such as skimmers, having part of the tank system, such as a refugium, on a
reverse photocycle so some organisms are always photosynthesizing, or by more rapidly
exchanging the room air with exterior air. One can also impact the diurnal pH fluctuation
by adding high pH additives (like limewater or other high pH alkalinity additives) during
the nightly pH minimum, and by adding low pH additives (like sodium bicarbonate) during
the daily pH maximum.
The magnitude of the alkalinity itself, of
course, can influence pH stability, and that is the focus of the next section.
What is "Buffering"
Buffer and buffering are terms that are
thrown around indiscriminately in the world of reefkeeping, and the actual meaning of
these terms is often lost. Many aquarists refer to any alkalinity supplement as a buffer,
but this isnt the case. For example, neither sodium bicarbonate nor sodium
carbonate, taken alone, is a true buffer.
A buffer is something that helps minimize pH
changes in the presence of added acid or base. No buffer can completely stop the pH from
changing when acid or base is added. The change in pH, however, is made smaller when an
appropriate buffer is used. A buffer is almost always comprised of two different chemical
entities. Bicarbonate and carbonate together, for example, form a buffer in the pH range
from about 8 to 11 in seawater, though the buffering is best between about 8.5 and 10.0
(ignoring that at high pH some calcium carbonate may precipitate).
Heres what is happening on a chemical
level. When a base (such as OH-) is added to the system (in an effort to raise
pH), some of the bicarbonate is converted to carbonate. This process effectively
"uses up" some of the OH- that was added, and the pH does not rise as
much as it would without the "buffer".
4. HCO3- + OH- à CO3--
So overall, we have:
5. HCO3- and CO3--
+ OH- à less HCO3-
and more CO3--
When an acid (H+) is added to the
system (in an effort to lower pH), some of the carbonate is converted to bicarbonate. This
process effectively "uses up" some of the H+ that was added, and the pH does not
drop as much as it would without the "buffer".
6. CO3--
+ H+ à HCO3-
So overall we have:
7. HCO3-
and CO3-- + H+ à more HCO3- and less CO3--
Of course, in order for this process to
buffer against both pH rises and pH drops, there must be a significant amount of both HCO3-
and CO3-- present. At about pH 8.9 in seawater at 25 °C there are equal
concentrations of HCO3- and CO3--. At lower pH, there is less CO3--,
and at pH 8.0 there is really quite little carbonate in seawater (only about 4% of the
bicarbonate level). Consequently, seawater is not especially well buffered against
substantial pH drops when the pH is already less than 8.0. It is, however, well buffered
against substantial pH rises.
Heres an actual experiment. Take
artificial seawater (Instant Ocean made to S=35; alkalinity measured to be 2.26 meq/L by
titration) and add 0.5 meq/L of either acid or base. The results of an immediate pH
measurement (before atmospheric carbon dioxide has a chance to equilibrate) are:
Starting Solution pH = 8.10
0.5 meq/L OH- added pH = 8.76
0.5 meq/L H+ added pH = 6.91
As we can see, the added base (OH-) drives
the pH up by only 0.66 units, while the added acid dropped the pH by 1.19 units. This
result shows that the water is better buffered against a pH rise than a pH drop, and the
reason for this difference is simply that there is more bicarbonate than carbonate at pH
8.1. The only reason that the drop stops at pH 6.9 is that at that point, bicarbonate is
really doing the buffering as it is converted into carbonic acid:
8. HCO3- + H+ à H2CO3
The difference in the buffering against
substantial pH rises and drops is obvious from such an experiment. Nevertheless, there is
much more to fully understanding how a buffer works. Chemists have chosen the term
"buffer intensity" (symbolized by b) to reflect the buffering capacity of a
solution at any given pH. While it has an exact mathematical definition, it is beyond the
scope of this article to describe b in detail. There are, however, a few details worth
mentioning in the context of reefkeeping (with additional details are provided in
"Aquatic Chemistry Concepts" by James Pankow).
The most important fact to reefkeepers is
that the buffering due to bicarbonate and carbonate, at a given pH, is directly related to
the carbonate alkalinity. If you double the alkalinity, you double b, and hence have twice
as much buffering due to the carbonate and bicarbonate system. In normal seawater, the
carbonate/bicarbonate system provides a substantial portion of the total buffering (which
is quantified below). Consequently, marine aquaria with higher alkalinity tend to have
greater buffering against pH swings.
Other, more esoteric tidbits arise from this system as
well. For example, while the buffering against substantial changes can be different in the
two different directions (as shown experimentally above), the buffering against very small
changes is necessarily exactly the same. Thats what b represents: the buffering against infinitesimally small changes in
pH in either direction. b
changes as a function of pH, and is maximal when the concentrations of the two forms of
the buffer (e.g., bicarbonate and carbonate) are equal. In seawater, b is locally maximized around pH 5.8
where the buffer is H2CO3/HCO3- and at pH 8.9 where the
buffer is HCO3-/CO3-- (ignoring the fact that other things happen at
high pH, like precipitation of magnesium hydroxide and calcium carbonate). These are the
points where seawater is most resistant to changes in pH as acid or base is added.
Unfortunately, reef tanks are not usually kept at those pH values, and so the buffering
effect of the carbonate system is not as effective at holding pH steady as it might
otherwise be.
Proud sponsor of this column
This lack of effective
buffering at a normal tank pH is one of the reasons that some salt manufacturers (Seachem,
as told to me by the late Leo Morin, and possibly to a lesser extent, Coralife) boost the borate concentrations in their
salt mixes. Since the pKa of borate in seawater is about 8.6, its maximal b (pH 8.6)
is not far from the range experienced by reef tanks. In normal seawater at pH 8, borate
provides about half of the buffering against a small downward pH change, despite the fact
that it provides less than 3% of the total alkalinity. In Seachem salt, where borate is
about 10x natural levels, borate totally dominates the buffering in the pH range
experienced by reef tanks.
Alkalinity Supplements
One of the most common issues that
reefkeepers face involves supplementing alkalinity while maintaining a reasonable pH.
Alkalinity supplements impact pH in a variety of ways. One of these ways is the immediate
altering of the pH. Different alkalinity supplements have different immediate impacts on
pH, as most reefkeepers are aware. This impact is why, for example, limewater needs to be
added slowly to a tank but sodium bicarbonate does not.
For this discussion, lets presume that
we want to supplement the carbonate alkalinity of a reef tank. That is, in the end we want
to increase the bicarbonate and carbonate levels in the tank. There are a variety of ways
to achieve this end, and these different ways have different immediate impacts on pH.
Three of these ways (and combinations thereof) are fairly common in reefkeeping. These
ways are addition of bicarbonate, carbonate, and hydroxide. In a reef tank that is
permitted to equilibrate its total CO2 levels with the atmosphere, these additions all end
up with the same final pH. That is, it is only the amount of alkalinity added that
determines the final pH, not the nature of the additive itself.
In the short term, however, the impact on pH
is very different. To quantify this, I measured to pH change on adding 0.5 meq/L of each
of these alkalinity supplements to freshly made salt water (Instant Ocean made to S=35;
alkalinity measured to be 2.26 meq/L by titration). Heres the result for the pH
found immediately, and then after 24 and 120 hours of sitting, unstirred, in an open 500-
mL beaker:
Supplement
Initial pH
24 hour pH
120 hour pH
none
8.10
8.11
8.21
0.5 meq/L HCO3-
8.06
8.15
8.33
0.5 meq/L CO3--
8.44
8.28
8.34
0.5 meq/L OH-
8.76
8.47
8.33
0.5 meq/L H+
6.91
7.91
8.15
From this data it is clear to see the large
increase in pH caused by the addition of hydroxide, and also the significant increase when
using carbonate. Bicarbonate, on the other hand, shows the expected slight decrease in pH,
but not nearly as much as is found with a strong acid of equal concentration. It is also
clear that after sufficient time to equilibrate with atmospheric CO2, these
differences disappear, and the pH is the same for all of the 0.5-meq/L alkalinity
additions. This is an important result: in seawater in equilibrium with the atmosphere,
for a given alkalinity there is a single pH that results, regardless of what was added to
get to that alkalinity.
Heres how to think of these additions.
When these chemicals are added to the water, there is a change in the relative
concentrations of carbonate and bicarbonate, and it is the ratio of these two ions that
determines the pH.
Hydroxide Addition
For hydroxide addition, the first thing that
happens is that bicarbonate is converted into carbonate:
9. HCO3- + OH- à CO3--
and the small amount of carbonic acid present
is converted into bicarbonate:
10. H2CO3 + OH-
à HCO3- + H2O
Proud sponsor of this column
The net effect is that the
pH rise that is normally encountered by adding hydroxide to water is reduced. For example,
adding 0.5 meq/L of hydroxide to freshwater would drive the pH into the 10s. In
seawater, the pH rises much less, and the conversion of bicarbonate to carbonate is
largely responsible.
In this situation, the tank is now deficient
in H2CO3 (because the small equilibrium amount of H2CO3
normally present was partially converted to bicarbonate by the OH- addition),
and the tank proceeds to absorb CO2 from the air, bringing the pH back down a
bit by releasing H+. There are many ways to show these reactions, but the net
process involves CO2 from the air becoming carbonic acid, the carbonic acid
deprotonating to bicarbonate, and some of the bicarbonate deprotonating to carbonate:
11. CO2
(atmosphere) + H2O à H2CO3
12. H2CO3 à HCO3- + H+
13. HCO3- à CO3-- + H+
The reactions taking place in equations 11-13
all serve to lower the pH (from 8.76 to 8.33 in the experiment above). When equilibrium is
reached, however, the pH has not dropped all of the way back to the point before the
hydroxide was added, but is slightly elevated (8.33 in the example above). When all is
said and done, and the tank has fully equilibrated with the air, the hydroxide addition
has caused the tank to experience an increase in bicarbonate and carbonate, and in pH.
Carbonate Addition
The case for carbonate addition is similar to
that for hydroxide. In this situation, the pH rises because much of the carbonate combines
with H+ to form bicarbonate. This obviously reduces the H+, which results in a higher pH:
14. H+ + CO3-- (added) à HCO3-
In this case, the net short-term effect is
that carbonate and bicarbonate increase, and the pH rises (from 8.10 to 8.44 in the
experiment above). In the long term, the higher pH causes more CO2 to be pulled
in from the air, as was the case with hydroxide additions. This limits the pH rise, and
further increases the bicarbonate concentration. Still, the end effect is the same as
hydroxide addition: the tank experiences an increase in bicarbonate and carbonate, and in
pH.
Bicarbonate Addition
The addition of bicarbonate as an alkalinity
supplement is rather different. In this case, the bicarbonate partially dissociates into
carbonate and H+, and the tank experiences an increase in bicarbonate and carbonate, and a
drop in pH.:
15. HCO3- à H+ + CO3--
Consequently, the immediate effect on pH is
for it to drop. The drop is small because not much of the bicarbonate dissociates at
normal tank pH, but enough does to drive the pH a bit lower (from 8.10 to 8.06 in the
experiment above).
In the long term, however, the effect is
different. Since a substantial amount of bicarbonate was added and the pH did not change
much, the tank is now overloaded with bicarbonate with respect to what it would normally
have in equilibrium with air. Some of the bicarbonate picks up a proton, becomes carbonic
acid, and the pH rises as the CO2 is blown off to the atmosphere:
16. HCO3- + H+ à H2CO3 à CO2 + H2O
In the experiment above, this effect has
caused the pH to rise from 8.06 to 8.33. So the long-term effect of bicarbonate addition
(as it is for any addition to carbonate alkalinity) is to raise pH even though the
short-term effect was to lower it.
Summary
Alkalinity and pH are two of what I would
call the big 5 in terms of parameters important in keeping a reef tank (the others being
calcium, salinity, and temperature). Alkalinity and pH are related to each other in ways
that are obvious, and in other ways that are much more subtle. Unfortunately, these
parameters are often problematic for people maintaining aquaria, and the relationship
between the two is one of the biggest areas of concern. I have found that more than half
of the questions posed on reef chemistry internet forums relate to pH or alkalinity.
Obviously, these parameters are confusing to many aquarists. Hopefully, this article has
put these relationships in perspective, and will help aquarists to better understand their
systems.
Two texts that provide additional detail on
this subject are shown below. Milleros book is especially suited to seawater, but
isnt as detailed or mathematical as Pankows.
Millero, Frank J.; Editor. Chemical
Oceanography, Second Edition. (1996), 496 pp.
Pankow, James F.; Aquatic Chemistry
Concepts (1991), 673 pp.