FEATURE
ARTICLE, PART I by TIMOTHY A. HOVANEC, Ph.D. and JENNIFER L.
COSHLAND
Sponsored
in part by:
A
Chemical Analysis of Select Trace Elements in Synthetic Sea
Salts and Natural Seawater
Marineland
Aquatic Research Laboratory, Moorpark, California 93021
INTRODUCTION
TO THIS SERIES
Proud
sponsor of this column
In
marine aquarium science there are many issues that have been
passionately debated for decades. Two of the most common issues
involve the questions of 1) which is 'better' - natural seawater
or synthetic sea salts, and 2) trace elements in synthetic sea
salts: good or bad? Unfortunately, there is little real science
to support any side of the arguments for these topics.
For
many people it just seems like common sense to think that natural
seawater is better than any synthetic sea salt because, of course,
that's where the animals live. But that thinking assumes that
the natural seawater a hobbyist has access to IS the
water the animals live in. For most aquarists, even those living
on the coast, that is plainly not the case. Furthermore, when
it comes to trace elements or heavy metals once again it just
"seems" to be right that natural seawater would be the choice.
One can look in scientific books and get values for trace elements
in seawater, which are very low, which would support the contention
that natural seawater is the best choice. But what is the truth?
How
much real data is there for us to discuss and develop an informed
opinion? In early 2003, an article was published which reflected
poorly on the two most popular sea salts on the market; Instant
Ocean® and Coralife® (Shimek 2003). The central thesis
of this article was that these salts contained huge amounts
of many trace elements and so would be toxic in a marine aquarium.
"Proof" of this was offered by the author in the way of the
results of a bioassay test on these salts and a few others.
In this test, a majority of the sea urchin larvae died in the
Instant Ocean and Coralife treatments compared to the other
treatments. On the surface, it seemed like a pretty open and
shut case.
However,
the great thing about science is that others can repeat, expand
and comment about published work. Over the next several months,
my research group will present the results of studies we have
done to duplicate the experiment of Shimek. The work will be
presented in three parts:
Part
1: A Chemical Analysis of Trace Elements in Synthetic Sea Salts
and Natural Seawater.
Part
2: The Toxicity of Synthetic Sea Salts and Natural Seawater
to the Development of White Sea Urchin (Lytichinus pictus) larvae,
and
Part
3: It is really a "Bad Beginning" or was it just Bad Science:
A Rebuttal to Shimek 2003.
The
goal of this series of papers is to contribute some real data
to the discussion of natural seawater, synthetic sea salt and
trace elements. I don't contend that these papers offer the
definitive answer. On the contrary, I believe they offer a foundation
on which other studies can build. However, I do think they offer
a format for future studies in that they present real data instead
of conjecture. I hope everyone will find the papers thought
provoking and interesting.
Sincerely,
Dr.
Timothy A. Hovanec*
Shimek,
R. 2003 The Toxicity of Some Freshly Mixed Artificial Sea Water:
A Bad Beginning for A Reef Aquarium. www.reefkeeping.com March
2003.
*In
the interest of fair disclosure, it should be pointed out that
Dr. Hovanec is the Chief Science Officer for Marineland which
makes Instant Ocean synthetic sea salts.
ABSTRACT
Eight
commercially available synthetic sea salts (SSS), Instant Ocean
(IO), BioSea Marine Mix (BSMM), Crystal Seas Marine Mix Bioassay
(CSMMB), Coralife (CL), Tropic Marin (TM), Reef Crystals (RC),
Red Sea (RS) and Oceanic Sea Salt (OSS), and two natural seawater
samples Catalina Water Company (CWC) and unfiltered seawater
(NSW-M) collected from Malibu State Beach, CA, were analyzed
via ICP-MS for eleven trace elements and by ICP-MS/DRC for four
other trace elements. The majority of the SSS examined had trace
element concentrations at values equal to or below those for
natural seawater. The trace elements beryllium, cobalt and copper
were below the limit of detection for all samples. Silver and
Thallium were detected only in OSS. CSMMB was the only SSS with
a detectable level of aluminum (10 ppb) but NSW had the largest
amount (20 ppb). Cadmium was detected in only two samples: TM
(0.31 ppb) and BSMM (0.24 ppb). Zinc was found in four samples:
CWC with the highest value (21 ppb) followed by RS (5 ppb),
TM (4.1 ppb) and CL (2.9 ppb). Vanadium was detected in four
SSS (TM, RC, OSS and CSMMB) but the levels were lower than NSW
at 2.0 ppb. Trace amounts (<1 ppb) of chromium were found
in five SSS (IO, RC, OSS, RS, and CSMMB) but a sixth (BSMM)
contained 27 ppb. Lead was found in six SSS (TM, OSS, RS, CL,
CSMMB and BSMM) at various levels below 2 ppb, however, CWC
had concentration of 39 ppb. The remaining trace elements (antimony,
manganese, molybdenum and nickel) were detected in all the samples
at levels generally at or below that of NSW-M except for one
SSS. BSMM had significantly higher concentrations of all these
trace elements: (Sb-3.5 ppb; Mn-135 ppb, Mo-87 ppb and Ni-108
ppb) compared to all other samples tested. In terms of the total
amount of trace elements detected, three SSS (TM, IO and RC)
formed a group with levels below 33 ppb while another three
(OSS, RS and CL) had a total concentration near 40 ppb. These
two groups of SSS had lower total levels of trace elements than
NSW-M and CWC. Of the remaining SSS, CSMMB (58.21 ppb) was higher
than NSW-M (44.68 ppb) but lower than CWC (73.78 ppb). The last
SSS, BSMM, had a total trace element concentration of over 361
ppb.
Proud
sponsor of this column
INTRODUCTION
Chemical
elements in seawater are commonly grouped into three general
categories: major, minor and trace. Pilson (1998) defines the
major elements, of which there are eleven, as those that occur
in concentrations greater than 1 ppm (1 mg/kg), admittedly an
arbitrary value (Table 1). The distinction between minor and
trace elements is even more arbitrary and different authors
will use different concentrations for the dividing line. Morel
and Price (2003) define trace as <0.1 µM while Kennish
(1994) states that the average concentration of 22 trace elements
ranged between 0.05 and 50 µmol/kg.
Table
1. The Eleven Major Elements or Constituents in Seawater (g/kg)
Sodium
(Na+)*
10.781
Chloride
(Cl-)*
19.353
Magnesium
(Mg++)*
1.284
Sulfate
(SO4--)*
2.712
Calcium
(Ca++)
0.4119
Bicarbonate
(HCO3-)
0.126
Potassium
(K+)*
0.399
Bromide
(Br-)*
0.0673
Strontium
(Sr+)
0.00794
Boric
Acid (H3BO3)
0.0257
Fluoride
(F-)*
0.00130
*For
these chemicals there is no evidence that their concentration
varies within any of the major ocean water masses (Pilson
1998).
What
is perhaps more important when distinguishing major elements
from minor and trace elements is that major elements are almost
all conservative while most minor and trace elements are not.
Conservative means that the proportion of the element of concern
is nearly constant to other conservative elements and to the
salinity of the water. This is also know as Marcet's Principle
or more formally the Principle of Constant Composition (Pilson
1998). Most elements in seawater below a concentration of 1
mg/kg, including many trace elements, are not conservative (Pilson
1998). If an element is not considered conservative it may then
be classified as recycled and/or scavenged. However, some elements
may fall into two of the three classifications above. For instance,
depending upon water depth, copper and iron are both recycled
and scavenged (Kremling et. al. 1999). These two elements are
depleted in surface waters due to the high productivity associated
with this zone of maximum sunlight penetration, and so algae
growth, but then their concentrations increase with depth as
they are recycled from the decay of marine snow. Table 2 lists
some common trace elements, their mean concentration in the
ocean and classification according to the above discussion points.
Table
2. The Mean Concentration and Type of Distribution of Some Common
Trace Elements in Seawater (ppm)
Aluminum
(Al)
0.000270
mid-depth
minima
Manganese
(Mn)
0.000027
depleted
at depth
Antimony
(Sb)
0.000146
?
Molybdenum
(Mo)
0.010
conservative
Beryllium
(Be)
0.0000002
nutrient,
scavenged
Nickel
(Ni)
0.000470
nutrient
Cadmium
(Cd)
0.000079
nutrient
Silver
(Ag)
0.0000027
nutrient,
complexed
Chromium
(Cr)
0.000208
nutrient
Thallium
(Tl)
0.000012
conservative
Cobalt
(Co)
0.000001
depleted
at surface
Vanadium
(V)
0.002
slight surface
depletion
Copper(Cu)
0.000254
nutrient,
scavenged
Zinc
(Zn)
0.000392
nutrient
Lead
(Pb)
0.000002
high in
surface waters
*adapted
from Pilson 1998
An
important difference between major and minor or trace elements
is that higher concentrations for many minor or trace elements
may be toxic to much life in the ocean at various trophic levels
and/or life stages. This can be especially important when maintaining
aquatic life in closed aquatic systems such as aquaria. Paradoxically,
however, many of these "toxic" trace elements are also required
nutrients. In fact, the argument among marine biologists as
to whether primary productivity in the Ocean is phosphorus or
nitrogen limited is muted by the findings that trace elements
such as iron can play a more important role in controlling productivity.
Proud
sponsor of this column
Another
phenomena which must be considered when discussing trace elements
in seawater is the interaction of some elements with particles
in the water column. For instance, trace elements such Al, Co,
Pb and Mn, which are classified as scavenged types, have strong
interaction with particles which results in short residence
times in the water column as the particles sink into deeper
water (Kremling et. al. 1999). Thus, the toxicity potential
of these and other elements must take into consideration the
'state' of the element in the water column.
Unfortunately,
no research exists on the potentially positive or negative effects
of low amounts of various trace elements in aquaria. Indeed,
for many years several manufacturers of synthetic sea salts,
in order to provide a complete formula, added or separately
provided trace elements to their basic formula (Anonymous 1985,
1990). In recent years, however, this practice has nearly stopped
as it was realized that many trace elements are naturally present
in low quantities in the major chemical compounds, such as sodium
chloride, magnesium chloride and sodium sulfate, used to make
synthetic sea salts.
However,
concern still exists among hobbyists as to whether the use of
synthetic sea salts versus natural seawater for marine aquaria
results in the continued deleterious introduction of high levels
of trace elements to the aquarium. In this study, we analyzed
the concentration of several trace elements in synthetic sea
salts developed for marine aquaria and compared the results
to natural seawater from the coast of California to determine
if there were significant trace element differences between
these two sources of seawater for aquaria.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
A natural
seawater sample was collected from the surf zone of the Pacific
Ocean at Malibu State Beach, CA in a pre-cleaned, acid washed
bottle. The sample was stored in a cooler and transported to
the laboratory. Salinity was determined with a refractometer
(Bio-Marine AquaFauna).
All
the synthetic sea salts for this study were purchased from commercial
sources except Instant Ocean and Reef Crystals which were obtained
from stock at Marineland. Enough of each salt was weighed out
to obtain a salinity of 33 ppt to match the salinity of the
natural seawater sample. Samples were diluted with deionized
water. All samples were coded so that the brand would not be
apparent to the analysts. Samples, including deionized water,
were transported to West Coast Analytical Services, Inc., Santa
Fe Spring, CA in a cooler with ice for analysis.
Samples
were analyzed for eleven elements (Al, Sb, Be, Cd, Co, Pb, Mn,
Mo, Ag, Tl and Zn) via Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry
(ICP-MS) without further treatment. Another four elements (Cr,
Cu, Ni and V) were analyzed by ICP-MS/DRC (Dynamic Reaction
Cell). All the samples except OSS were analyzed at the same
time. OSS was analyzed at a later date due to its unavailability
until that time. During both sample runs, quality control samples
were run in parallel on the deionized water used to make-up
the synthetic seawater and on fortified laboratory blanks.
RESULTS
Table
3 presents the results of the analysis of fifteen trace elements
for eight brands of synthetic sea salts (SSS): Instant Ocean
(IO), BioSea Marine Mix (BSMM), Crystal Seas Marine Mix Bioassay
(CSMMB), Coralife (CL), Tropic Marin (TM), Reef Crystals (RC),
Red Sea (RS) and Oceanic Sea Salt (OSS). Also presented in Table
3 are the data for a natural seawater product for use in marine
aquaria, Catalina Water Company (CWC), and natural seawater
(NSW-M). The detection limit (DL) for each element and mean
published values for the concentration of the elements in seawater
are also presented (Table 3).
Examining
the results by each element shows that for three elements (Be,
Co, and Cu) no sample had concentrations above the detection
limit (DL). Another two elements (Ag and Tl) were found only
in OSS at values close to (Ag) or just under the DL (Tl). Therefore,
these five elements are not considered further, leaving ten
elements for discussion.
Aluminum
(Al) was detected in only two samples: NSW-M at a concentration
of 20 ppb and one SSS, CSMMB with a level of 10 ppb (Fig. 1).
Four samples were found to contain levels of zinc (Zn) above
the detection limit. CWC had a zinc concentration of 21 ppb
which was 4 to 7 times greater than the three SSS (TM, RS and
CL) found to contain Zn (Table 3) (Fig. 1).
Detectable
amounts of lead (Pb) were found in all treatments except NSW-M,
IO and RC (Fig. 1). CWC had the highest level of Pb at 39 ppb.
CSMMB and OSS were next highest at 1.7 to 1.8 ppb Pb, respectively
(Fig. 1). The remaining SSS had Pb values ranging from 0.37
to 0.82 ppb (Fig. 1).
Chromium
(Cr) was detected in six of the eight SSS samples ranging from
a high of 27 ppb in BSMM to 0.29 ppb in IO (Fig. 1).
Figure #1
All
the SSS, except CL, were found to contain antimony but many
were at levels near or below NSW-M (0.36 ppb). BSMM had the
highest value at 3.5 ppb followed by CSMMB (1.4 ppb) (Fig. 2).
Cadmium was found only in TM (0.31 ppb) and BSMM (0.24 ppb).
Four SSS samples were also found to contain measurable levels
of vanadium though the amounts were less than that for NSW-M
which at 2 ppb equaled the published average value for seawater
(Table 2).
Figure #2
Proud
sponsor of this column
Proud
sponsor of this column
The
remaining elements (Mn, Mo and Ni) were detected in all the
samples tested expect Mo was not detected in CWC (Fig. 3). For
these three elements, the general pattern is the same. BSMM
had levels of each element that were 4 to 32 times higher than
the next highest sample. For two of the elements (Mn and Ni)
CSMMB was that next highest sample; for Mo the second highest
SSS was TM. Of all the trace elements assayed, Mo is the one
highest in natural seawater at an average of 10 ppb. The values
for NSW-M (13.4 ppb) and CWC (11.4 ppb) were close to the average
seawater value. All the SSS tested, except BSMM, contained less
than 10 ppb Mo. BSMM had a MO concentration of 87 ppb Mo. TM
was closest to the NSW average with a Mo value of 9 ppb.
Figure #3
Determined
values for Mn in the SSS ranged from a low of 7.5 ppb in TM
to a high of 135 ppb in BBMM with the remaining SSS having values
between 22 and 35 ppb. NSW-M was found to contain 8 ppb Mn while
Mn was undetectable in CWC.
Nickel
was the only trace element, besides Mn and Mo, that was detected
in every sample. Nickel was lowest in the OSS sample (0.37 ppb)
which is lower than the average of NSW (0.47 ppb) followed by
CWC and NSW-M. BSMM had the highest amount of Ni at 108 ppb.
CL and CSMMB were the next highest SSS at 3.3-3.4 ppb. The rest
of the SSS had Ni values ranging from 1.1 to 2.2 ppb.
When
considering the results from the standpoint of the total amount
of trace elements determined, the samples fall roughly into
two groups with values below that of the natural seawater sample
and then three samples with values higher or much higher than
natural seawater (Fig. 4, Table 3). The first group, consisting
of TM, IO and RC, had total measured values ranging from 25
to 32.4 ppb and were the lowest tested. The second group, with
values ranging from 39 to 44 ppb, included OSS, RS and CL and
was close to the value determined for NSW-M of 44.68 ppb. Two
SSS and CWC had total trace elements values greater than NSW-M.
CSMMB had a total value of 58.21 while BSMM concentration was
361.31 ppb. CWC fell in between these levels with a total value
of 73.78 ppb.
Figure #4
Table
3. Determined values for 15 trace elements in seawater and several
commercially available synthetic sea salts in ppb
Element
Tropic Marin (TM)
Instant Ocean (IO)
Reef Crystals (RC)
Oceanic (OSS)
Red Sea (RS)
Coralife (CL)
Aluminum (Al)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Antimony (Sb)
0.24
0.61
0.62
0.18
0.18
ND
Beryllium (Be)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cadmium (Cd)
0.31
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Chromium (Cr)
ND
0.29
0.46
0.65
0.51
ND
Cobalt (Co)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Copper (Cu)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Lead (Pb)
0.82
ND
ND
1.7
0.37
0.57
Manganese (Mn)
7.5
22
25
28.5
29
30
Molybdenum (Mo)
9
4.1
4.2
7.1
5.1
7.2
Nickel (Ni)
2.0
1.1
1.8
0.37
2.2
3.3
Silver (Ag)
ND
ND
ND
0.35
ND
ND
Thallium (Tl)
ND
ND
ND
0.14
ND
ND
Vanadium (V)
0.87
ND
0.31
0.21
ND
ND
Zinc (Zn)
4.1
ND
ND
ND
5
2.9
Total Amount (ppb)
24.84
28.10
32.39
39.20
42.36
43.97
Table
#3 cont...
Element
Natural
Seawater (NSW-M)
Crystal
Seas Marine Mix Bioassay (CSMMB)
Catalina
Water (CWC)
BioSea
Marine Mix (BSMM)
Detection
Limit*
Natural
Seawater**
Aluminum
(Al)
20
10
ND
ND
8
0.270
Antimony
(Sb)
0.36
1.4
0.28
3.5
0.1
0.146
Beryllium
(Be)
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.2
0.000
Cadmium
(Cd)
ND
ND
ND
0.24
0.2
0.079
Chromium
(Cr)
ND
1.0
ND
27
0.2
0.208
Cobalt
(Co)
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.1
0.001
Copper
(Cu)
ND
ND
ND
ND
3
0.254
Lead
(Pb)
ND
1.81
39
0.57
0.3
0.002
Manganese
(Mn)
8
35
ND
135
1
0.027
Molybdenum
(Mo)
13.4
4.4
11.4
87
0.5
10.000
Nickel
(Ni)
0.92
3.4
0.9
108
0.3
0.470
Silver
(Ag)
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.2
0.0027
Thallium
(Tl)
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.2
0.012
Vanadium
(V)
2.0
1.2
1.2
ND
0.2
2.000
Zinc
(Zn)
ND
ND
21
ND
2
0.392
Total
Amount (ppb)
44.68
58.21
73.78
361.31
13.8638
*Detection
Limit refers to the lowest possible detection limit within
the seawater matrix and analytical procedures of the analyses
**Values
for Natural Seawater are from Pilson (1998)
ND
- not detected, below detection limit
Proud
sponsor of this column
However,
looking at the total amount of the trace elements in a sample
does not present a complete picture of analysis. While Tropic
Marin (TM) had the lowest total trace element value, it did
have substantial amounts of certain elements. Eight of the fifteen
trace elements tested were detectable in TM. TM had the highest
amount of cadmium (0.31 ppb) which was only detected in one
other sample (BSMM - 0.24 ppb). TM was also one of the few sample
with detectable amounts of zinc with a value of 4.1 ppb. This
zinc value was surpassed only by Red Sea (RS - 5 ppb) and Catalina
Water Company (CWC - 21 ppb). The low overall total value for
TM is due to the fact that it had lowest Mn value of all the
SSS tested, having only roughly a third of the Mn as most of
the other SSS (Table 3).
In
contrast to Tropic Marin, only five of the fifteen measured
elements were detected in Instant Ocean (IO) which had the second
lowest total amount of trace elements. No element was found
in greatest concentration in IO, and IO had the lowest amount
of Mo for all samples. Furthermore, nearly 93% of the total
amount of measured trace elements in IO came from just two elements:
Mn at 78% and Mo with 14.6%.
The
third SSS in the group with the lowest amounts of measured trace
elements was Reef Crystals with a value of 32.39 ppb (Table
3). Made by the same company that manufactures IO, but designed
to contain certain trace elements and minerals for reef tanks,
it is not surprising that RC is close to, but slightly higher
than IO, in terms of trace metal concentration. Again, like
IO, RC did not contain the highest amount of any trace element
for the SSS tested and slightly over 77% of the total trace
elements was due to one element (Mn) with another 13% due to
Mo.
The
second group of SSS, Oceanic Sea Salt (OSS), Red Seas (RS) and
Coralife (CL), while having a total amount of the trace elements
measured lower than NSW had varying amounts of additional elements
when compared to the first group of SSS. For instance, both
RS and CL were two of three SSS with measurable levels of zinc
and RS has the highest zinc level of all SSS tested (Table 3).
OSS had one of the highest amounts of chromium (1.65 ppb) and
lead (1.7 ppb) for all SSS and was the only seasalt with detectable
levels of silver and thallium. However, OSS did have the lowest
amount of Ni for all samples tested.
The
two remaining SSS tested, CSMMB and BSMM, had slightly higher
and considerably higher total amounts of measured trace elements,
respectively. BSMM had a total of 361.31 ppb of trace elements
and had the greatest amount of five of the twelve elements detected
in all samples (Sb, Cr, Mn, Mo, and Ni). For many of these five
elements, the amounts found in BSMM were an order of magnitude
higher than the next lowest SSS. CSMMB had the greatest amount
of Al of all SSS tested and also had significantly higher concentrations
of five other elements (Sb, Cr, Pb, Mn and Ni) compared to the
other SSS besides BSMM.
DISCUSSION
The
results of this study demonstrate that the vast majority of
synthetic sea salts for use in marine aquaria do not have concentrations
of the trace elements examined that are substantially greater
than that of the natural seawater available to the marine hobbyist.
Furthermore, for some trace elements natural seawater had a
greater value than some of the synthetic sea salts. Moreover,
Catalina Water Company, which is a natural seawater product,
had a lead value that was one to two orders of magnitude higher
than other samples. It is clear that most synthetic sea salts
do not add substantial amounts of trace levels to aquaria when
compared to the natural seawater available to the majority of
hobbyists.
However,
whether this is beneficial or detrimental to the aquarium environment
is not known. As previously mentioned, there are no scientific
studies applicable to marine aquaria which allow one to say
with a high degree of confidence that a certain amount of a
particular trace element is absolutely necessary in the marine
aquarium or that a constant low level of a certain element may
cause a poisoning of the aquarium. This is one area in need
of much research.
Conversely,
while the results of toxicity studies done on fish and some
corals allow one to predict that high concentrations of some
trace elements would be detrimental to the aquarium environment,
the results of this study show that most synthetic sea salts
do not contain such dangerously high levels of trace elements
for this to be a concern to the aquarist.
It
must be realized that the data herein are only for one sample
of each product at one time and subsequent analysis may produce
different values. This could be especially acute for any natural
seawater product because of biotic and abiotic environment factors
such as rain, algae blooms, ship traffic off the near coast,
etc. In fact, trace elements in synthetic sea salts would probably
vary less over time because manufacturers of these products
have more control over the raw materials used to make the product
compared to the total lack of control over the natural oceanic
environment.
Many
of the determined trace element values for the natural seawater
samples in this study were much higher than published values
(Table 3). However, published values are by necessity generalizations.
Actual values will vary due to locale and local factors that
have to be taken into consideration. For example, Pilson (1998)
noted that lead is high in surface waters most likely due to
anthropomorphic reasons. There are many other potential reasons
why the determined values in NSW may be much higher than average
published values for NSW. First, the actual concentration of
any trace element in NSW will vary considerably spatially and
temporally. Furthermore, water samples taken in coastal areas
and near major metropolitan areas would be expected to have
elevated concentrations of many elements due to run-off, winds
from the coastland, exposure to polluted air, upwelling, shipping
traffic in the ocean channels off the coast, and associated
factors. Plus, primary productivity can be very high in coastal
areas which can affect the concentration of many trace elements
as organisms consume and recycle nutrients, including trace
elements, in the course of their natural life cycles. These
factors are especially important for trace elements that are
nutritive rather than conservative.
Consider
that the natural seawater sample (NSW-M) in this study was determined
to have the highest amount of Al of all samples with a value
of 20 ppb. This value is not as strange as it may first seem
and further illustrates the problem with relying on published
general values for NSW. Pilson (1998) relates how atmospherically
transported dust, rich in clays containing aluminum, may be
the cause of the surface enrichment of aluminum. This could
certainly be the case with the natural seawater sample in this
study which was collect just beyond the surf zone off Malibu
State Beach, CA.
The
high values of lead and zinc in the natural seawater from Catalina
Seawater Company is most likely due to fuel fumes associated
with the ship collecting the seawater and the truck used to
transport the collected seawater. High surface concentrations
of lead in seawater have been linked to atmospherically transported
lead mainly from the exhausts of automobiles and trucks (Pilson
1998).
It
is perhaps natural that in discussing trace element values in
synthetic sea salts authors would want to compare values in
the salts with those of natural seawater. However, that view
assumes that hobbyists have access to natural seawater with
trace element values that match the values in the book or paper
the author is referring to. The results of this study show that
this is a false assumption. Natural seawater that is available
to the hobbyist comes from near shore sources and it should
not be surprising that water quality in these oceanic zones
differs greatly from that of more remote oceanic areas.
A question
in the back of the minds of researchers is - how good are the
data? For this study that means how correct is the analysis?
There are several ways to check the validity of the data. A
seawater reference standard with known values was run along
with the samples of this test. The determined values for the
reference standard were in close agreement with the known values
which tells one that the analytical methods (ICP-MS and ICP-MS/DRC)
were sufficiently accurate for this examination. Further support
for the validity of the test analytical methods can be found
by looking at some of the values for select trace elements for
natural seawater. For example, one of elements tested, molybdenum
is conservative and has a mean value in the ocean of 10 ppb,
with a range of 9.2 to 10.5 (Table 2) (Pilson 1998). The determined
values for natural seawater in this study, 11.4 to 13.4 ppb,
are in close agreement with these data adding validity to the
analytical procedure.
In
fact, this study may be the first to analyze natural seawater
samples alongside samples of synthetic sea salts. Earlier studies
on trace element concentrations in SSS did not include natural
seawater samples for reasons unknown. Atkinson and Bingman (1997)
analyzed a number of commercial sea salts but did not actually
include a seawater sample. Instead they listed values for various
elements and ions in seawater.
Atkinson
and Bingman (1997) included a number of sea salts in their analysis
that were also included in the present study (IO, TM, RC, RS,
and CL). In general, their determined values for most trace
elements were much higher than the values found in this study.
The most likely explanation for these differences is that the
analytical method used by Atkinson and Bingman (1997) to determine
trace element concentration in the sea salts was not sufficiently
precise and was subject to interferences which caused false
high readings. Atkinson and Bingman (1997) used Inductively
Coupled Plasma emission spectroscopy (ICP) for their analysis.
The current study used either ICP-MS or ICP-MS/DRC for the trace
element analysis. These methods are more precise than ICP and
can yield much better data. ICP-MS/DRC is used specifically
to remove interferences associated with the masses of various
elements during ICP-MS that can cause false high reading for
certain elements such as chromium, copper, nickel and vanadium.
Shimek (2002a) reported the analysis of a sample of Instant
Ocean made with reverse osmosis/deionized (RO/DI) water for
trace elements using ICP scan. His results were more like those
of this study; cadmium, chromium, lead, and manganese were below
the test detection limits. However, he also failed to include
a natural seawater sample for comparison and the 'average' natural
seawater presented were incorrect (Shimek 2002b).
The
chemical analysis of trace elements is not a straightforward
task. A trace element at a concentration of 1 µg/kg (1
ppb) in seawater is in a matrix of elements and compounds that
total nearly 35,000,000 µg (Pilson 1998). Contamination
during sampling, interference between elements, swamping of
the signal for one element by another element in much greater
concentration plus many other factors combine to make the analysis
difficult.
In
addition to the technical difficulties, the fact that many of
the trace elements have a biological role such that their concentration
will vary throughout the water column depending upon plankton
uptake and recycling leaves one to conclude that for many non-conservative
elements valves will range considerably.
Proud
sponsor of this column
The
concern over trace element concentrations in synthetic sea salts
is due to the fact that some trace elements, also known as heavy
metals, are toxic to marine organisms. However, heavy metal
toxicity is a complex phenomenon, especially so in marine environments.
The straightforward question of what is the toxic concentration
of a specific metal is not easily answered. Furthermore, a dozen
or so metals with an atomic mass over 50, including Mn, Fe,
Co, Ni, Cu Zn and Cd, have known biologically roles (Morel and
Price 2003). In fact, the surface depletion of most trace metals
is due to uptake by plankton (Morel and Price 2003). This leads
to the situation where the concentration of many trace metals
is orders of magnitude greater in the plankton compared to the
water in which the plankton live. Trace metals can also be transferred
and concentrated in the body of organisms at different trophic
levels in the marine food web (Twining and Fisher 2004).
Three
other major factors that confound efforts to determine actual
toxicity levels of many heavy metals are solubility, speciation
and chelation. The analytically determined value of any heavy
metal may not equate to the actual amount of the metal available,
either for nutritional purposes or toxic effects, in the seawater
environment. Pilson (1998) states that it is known that some
metals, such as Fe, Co, Cu and Zn, are quite strongly complexed
with organic matter in seawater and provides a detailed example,
using Cu, of how toxicity is affected by this interaction. Briefly,
studies have shown that the toxicity of copper is due to the
concentration or activity of the free copper ion in solution.
However, it has been calculated that about 90% of the copper
ion in seawater (at 15°C and normal pH) is complexed mostly
with carbonate and some hydroxyl ions. Taking into account the
activity coefficient of the copper ion, Pilson calculates that
only 2% of the actual Cu concentration is in the free (toxic)
form.
Morel
and Price (2003) state that for metals such as Fe, Co, Cu, Zn
and Cd the bulk of the dissolved concentration in seawater is
present in the nonreactive (nontoxic) form at the ocean surface.
The working theory is that this is due to the metals being bound
to some strong unknown ligands (or binding molecule) with a
small fraction of the metals being colloidal. These putative
ligands, or chelators, some of which have been shown to be from
biogenic sources are presumed to detoxify the metals and possibly
assist with metal transport and sequestration (Morel and Price
2003).
Some
metals - Fe, Mn, Cu and Co - have more than one oxidation state
in seawater and may further be subjected to a dynamic redox
cycle (Morel and Price 2003). This redox cycle is powered by
light and promotes charge-transfer reactions in some metal complexes
which causes the release of the metal from the oxidized ligand.
In fact, dissolved Mn is atypically, compared to many other
elements, at maximum concentration at the ocean surface due
to the photochemical reduction of Mn (IV) oxides to soluble
Mn (II) (Morel and Price 2003).
In
summary, trace element testing and toxicity are complex and
many factors must be considered besides just a hard to determine
analytical value. However, this study demonstrated several important
conclusions in regards to comparing synthetic sea salts to natural
seawater that should be of major importance to marine aquarists:
most synthetic
sea salts do not have high levels of many trace elements,
natural seawater
is not automatically a safe alternative to synthetic sea
salts when it comes to comparing amounts of trace elements
in the two solutions,
past comparisons
of synthetic sea salts to natural seawater are flawed because
they compared synthetic sea salts to a hypothetical natural
seawater that is not available to the majority of marine
hobbyists, and
synthetic sea
salts are quite acceptable for long-term use in marine aquaria
when considered from the viewpoint of not adding detrimental
concentrations of trace elements to the system.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We
wish to thank Elena Toy, Jennifer Westerlund and Jason Niemans
for their assistance with this study.
REFERENCES
Anonymous.
1985. Synthetic Sea Salts: Trace Elements, But So Much More.
SeaScope Vol 2 Spring 1985 page 1.
Anonymous.
1990. Trace elements and Sea Salt Mixes. SeaScope Vol 7
Summer 1990 page 1.
Atkinson,
M.J. and C. Bingman. 1997. Elemental composition of commercial
seasalts. J. Aquari. & Aqua. Sci. 8:39-43.
Kremling,
K., M.O. Andreae, L. Brügmann, C.M.G. van den Berg,
A. Prange, M. Schirmacher, F. Koroleff and J. Kuss. 1999.
Determination of Trace Elements p. 253-364. In: Methods
of Seawater Analysis 3rd ed. K. Graddhoff,
K. Kremling and M. Ehrhardt eds. Wiley-VCH Weinheim, Germany.
Morel,
F. M. M. and N. M. Price. 2003. The Biogeochemical Cycles
of Trace Metals in the Oceans. Science 300(5621):944-947.
Pilson,
M.E.Q. 1998. An Introduction to the Chemistry of the
Sea. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, N.J. 431p.