You are here: Home Blog Predator vs. Prey: Pollution Edition

Predator vs. Prey: Pollution Edition

By Leonard Ho - Posted Jun 13, 2011 09:00 AM
If you deal with pollution better than your predator, you can thrive. That's the conclusion derived from a study on the relationship between predator and their prey in polluted waters. As an example, glass shrimps eat substantially less in polluted environments, yet their population still blooms. The reason is their natural predator, killifish, are more negatively affected by pollution than the shrimps. But it's not always that simple.
Predator vs. Prey: Pollution Edition

Grass shrimp vs Killifish (above): The shrimp wins?! (Killifish photo by Rachel Tomster, Creative Commons)

Judith Weis, a professor of biology at Rutgers-Newark, published an article in BioScience magazine describing the phenomenon where prey population increases in polluted environments despite pollution's negative impact on them.

Professor Weis studied five different species of marine life around Hackensack Meadowlands and Piles Creek, New Jersey;  These sites are known for high levels of dioxin, PCBs, copper, lead, zinc, cadmium, chromium and mercury.  What she found was that prey population can thrive in polluted environments because the effects of pollution can significantly alter physiology and behavior in both prey and predator, thus shifting population within an ecosystem.

For example, fiddler crab populations increase in these polluted waters because pollution makes them "sick" and less active.  How can this possibly help?  It turns out being less active means they spend more time in their burrows where their natural predators, blue crabs, can't get at them.  Blue crabs also have been shown to hunt fiddler crabs with much less efficiency in polluted environments, forcing blue crabs on to an alternative diet of detritus and algae.

However, life isn't without its whim (and twisted justice).  Due to the toxicity levels of these waters, human consumption has been outlawed.  Without humans preying on blue crabs, blue crab populations have also increased.

Bluefish snappers in these polluted waters fare substantially worse than their prey.  Snappers who hunt from polluted waters bioassimilate the toxins of their prey, causing them to become more "ill" the more they eat.  As they accumulate more toxins, they become less adept at hunting ... a vicious cycle for the Bluefish (and a virtuous cycle for their prey).

The effects of pollution (or any environmental changes, for that matter), has complex - and sometimes surprising - consequences within an ecosystem.  As aquarists, we often approach aquarium problems in a very linear and narrow-minded manner.  Professor Weis' work reminds us that it's usually not that simple.

Oh, and being at the top of the food chain isn't all it's cracked up to be!

via BioScience via Underwater Times

Author: Leonard Ho
Location: Southern California

I'm a passionate aquarist of over 30 years, a coral reef lover, and the blog editor for Advanced Aquarist. While aquarium gadgets interest me, it's really livestock (especially fish), artistry of aquariums, and "method behind the madness" processes that captivate my attention.


Document Actions
Filed under:
blog comments powered by Disqus


Contribute to our blogs!

Do you have news or discussion topics you want to see blogged?  Let us know!